> dholland+sourcechanges eecs.harvard.edu said:
> > One case would be that I (have) import(ed)
NetBSD's libc more or less
> > wholesale into more than one research project; I
would like to be able
> > to continue to do that without wading through
every file to check for
> > licensing problems.
>
> As said in another mail, FreeBSD seems to take that
easier.
> I wouldn't assume that to be a result of different
negotiations
> with TOG, but of different interpretation.
> As a person which can barely read english text written
by
> normal humans, I can't honestly contribute to the
interpretation
> of the license text.
> My gut feeling is "no worries", but I'd like
to hear experts first
> before I move the manpages forth and back in the source
tree.
to me, i doesn't seem like a matter of interpretation.
iirc, we have been explicitly told that formatted man pages
should have
the TOG license notice. freebsd doesn't seem to have it.
YAMAMOTO Takashi
>
> > This should probably be discussed somewhere other
than source-changes,
> > too.
>
> OK, moved to netbsd-docs.
>
> best regards
> Matthias
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------
-------
>
------------------------------------------------------------
-------
> Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH
> 52425 Juelich
>
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Juelich
> Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Dueren
Nr. HR B 3498
> Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: MinDir'in Baerbel
Brumme-Bothe
> Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof. Dr. Achim Bachem
(Vorsitzender),
> Dr. Ulrich Krafft (stellv. Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr.
Harald Bolt,
> Dr. Sebastian M. Schmidt
>
------------------------------------------------------------
-------
>
------------------------------------------------------------
-------
|