Martin Husemann <martin duskware.de> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 10:26:25PM +0100, Rui Paulo
wrote:
> > Yes, this makes sense. Can you raise the question
at board or core ,
> > please ?
>
> I'm not sure I have seen all the early stages of this,
but IIRC the idea
> to only have one copy of the file came from www (in
reply to board asking
> to include the file in the web page somehow).
And I (can't speak for the rest of www) still believe that
it is possible.
Excuse me for the herecy, but I really see no troubles with
ROADMAP
in XML format. All that we need is a three forms of data
representation:o
1. paragraphs (para)
2. headers (section, title)
3. lists (itemizedlist, orderedlist, listitem)
Ah, I forget to mention some stuff like <email> and
<ulink>. Just
take a look to the following example:
<listitem>
<para>Review TCP/IP developments</para>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>Fix NewReno</para>
<para>Responsible: mycroft</para>
<para>ETA: (3.0)</para>
</listitem><listitem>
<para>Add SACK support to the
kernel.</para>
<para>Responsible: kurahone</para>
<para>ETA: (3.0)</para>
</listitem><listitem>
<para>Look into RFC3168 (ECN,
<ulink url="http://www.icir.or
g/floyd/ecn.html"/>)
and other "recent" and current TCP/IP
research. Adapt our
stack to the more modern world.</para>
<para>Responsible: TBD</para>
<para>ETA: ?</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</listitem>
And if this example still too complex to developers, I'll
really start thinking
on some tool to convert a wiki-like syntax to XML.
--
Mishka.
P.S. I'm working with documents in XML every day and prove
me,
after some practice you will not accept any other docs than
XML.
P.P.S. Seems that Jeremy's idea about completely new format
for htdocs
partialy have a sense.
|