List Info

Thread: Somebody got a scanner to work with xsane?




Somebody got a scanner to work with xsane?
country flaguser name
Norway
2007-08-14 14:53:27
Hi, all!
Do somebody got xsane working?

I'd has an Canon CanoScan N650U USB scanner, the kernel
finds it, and 
the sane-find-scanner ( as root ) says ther are a scanner
there, but is 
unable to determine what scanner it is. Somewhere in the
docs I'd read 
that sane-find-scanner do not work properly with NetBSD, and
the backend 
have to be set up manually. I'd have tried to set up
plustek, this 
should be the proper backend, but to no use. Xsane could not
open the 
device. I'd had to be root, some access rights may not have
ben set 
properly. I'd has not tried to get the rights proper yet, I
don't think 
that will alter anything else than whos able to access the
usb device. 
I'd have searched for some docs for how to do this, but
has'nt found 
anything besides a number of people which have the same
problem, and a 
person who claims that it's Canon's fault all the way,
they're not 
giving avay info needed to make a proper driver.

Hope somebody could help.

Cincerely,
Sigmund

Re: Somebody got a scanner to work with xsane?
country flaguser name
Sweden
2007-08-15 02:11:20
Sigmund Skjelnes wrote:
> Hi, all!
> Do somebody got xsane working?
A couple of months ago, it happened that my epson 3590
worked. Once in a 
while.
>
> I'd has an Canon CanoScan N650U USB scanner, the kernel
finds it, and 
> the sane-find-scanner ( as root ) says ther are a
scanner there, but 
> is unable to determine what scanner it is. Somewhere in
the docs I'd 
> read that sane-find-scanner do not work properly with
NetBSD, and the 
> backend have to be set up manually. I'd have tried to
set up plustek, 
> this should be the proper backend, but to no use. Xsane
could not open 
> the device. I'd had to be root, some access rights may
not have ben 
> set properly. I'd has not tried to get the rights
proper yet, I don't 
> think that will alter anything else than whos able to
access the usb 
> device. I'd have searched for some docs for how to do
this, but has'nt 
> found anything besides a number of people which have
the same problem, 
> and a person who claims that it's Canon's fault all the
way, they're 
> not giving avay info needed to make a proper driver.
Don't know about the driver. for the rights, see 
http://www.
sane-project.org/README.linux. The forth paragraph says
:

The device files used by libusb are located in
/proc/bus/usb/
(e.g. /proc/bus/usb/001/003) or in /dev/bus/usb/ (e.g.
/dev/bus/usb/001/003), if
you use udev.  The exact file name can be found out by
running sane-find-scanner
which would print "libusb:001:003" in this case. 
While setting permissions with
e.g. "chmod a+rw /proc/bus/usb/001/003" works,
this change is not permanent...

>
> Hope somebody could help.
>
> Cincerely,
> Sigmund
>
Best Regards,
David

[1-2]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )