> nate portents.com wrote:
>> A couple of things. The Quadra 700 can't do
16-bit, only 8-bit or
>> 24-bit,
>> and AFAIK there isn't support for 24-bit color X
in NetBSD (at least the
>
> Buh? You mean the (MacOS) control panel lists 16, 256,
and millions of
> colors...but not thousands? That seems very bizarre.
If you've got
> enough VRAM for 24 bit, why disable setting to 16?
It's not that it was disabled, it was just never
implimented - it wasn't a
design goal. The Quadra 700 and 900 were the first Macs
with built-in
true color (this is 1990, remember). Why compromise the
design by
supporting an inferior 16-bit bit depth? I don't think
there was even
such a thing as a NuBus video card previous to 1990 that
supported 16-bit
either. The Quadra 700 and 900 were primarily aimed at
prepress, and
nobody in prepress at the time was going to work in 16-bit.
And when you
look into how they implimented the 24-bit, using a technique
known as
'chunky planar', it's not surprising they didn't do
16-bit:
h
ttps://developer.apple.com/technotes/hw/hw_26.html
>> last time I tried). You can do 8-bit greyscale,
but not 8-bit color
>> because I don't think they ever got color lookup
tables working right.
>
> Yeah, the mac68k color X server is borked in 8 bit
color. I never tried
> 8 bit gray.
8-bit greyscale works, and since it has the same brightness
dynamic range
as 24-bit color, it can display true-color (in greyscale)
with no
dithering.
- Nate
|