mac68k and bsdstats

Array

Hi,

The entries for 7447A and 750 are PowerPCs.

The 750 is a G3, and the 7447 is a (likely) fairly fast G4.

cheers

bruce


On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 11:09:05AM +0200, Gheorghe Ardelean
wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, William Duke wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 2006-10-09 at 00:12 +0200, Gheorghe
Ardelean wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've found an interesting page designed to
spread the word about *BSD's.
> > > How many they are in use, which architectures
etc.The link is here:
> > >
> > >  http://www.bsdstats.org/
> > >
> > > By looking at this page I've seen that there
are not that many
> > > NetBSD systems registered and there have been
no mac68k. Now are 2
> > > systems I have registered (LC III + LC 475)
but I'd like to see higher
> > > numbers. So if you think this is ok for you
just download their script and
> > > put it somewhere on the system.
> > >
> > > To run the script one has to add the
following lines to /etc/rc.conf
> > >
> > >
monthly_statistics_report_devices="YES"
> > > monthly_statistics_enable="YES"
> > >
> > > and after that download and run the following
script:
> > >
> > > http
://www.bsdstats.org/downloads/300.statistics
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Johny.
> > >
> > > P.S. Could somebody spread the word on
netbsd-users or a more appropriate
> > > list?
> > >
> >
> > I was just looking at the CPU stats on this site. 
 There are 4 68k Macs
> > listed, and absolutely no PPC Macs listed.   At
least, none that I could
> > find.
> >
> > Of the four 68k Macs listed, there is one each of
the following:
> >
> > LC III
> > LC 475
> > Quadra 700
> > Quadra 950
> >
> > That's none too impressive.   I'm going to get my
LC III running this
> > script very soon and add a one to the LC III
column.   I think I might
> > even install NetBSD on my PowerMac 9500, just to
get one PPC stat in the
> > list.
> 
> Of corse is not that impressive but those are all my
machines.
> That's why I have written to the list... to spread the
word! 
> 
> This weekend the list will be extended with my PPC
machines also (PM 7300,
> PM 4400, Umax S900) 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Johny.
> 
> 

-- 
edoneelsdf.lonestar.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org

Hey

On Friday, September 22, 2006, at 02:08 PM, Bruce O'Neel
wrote:

>
> I've found an interesting page designed to spread the
word about *BSD's.
> How many they are in use, which architectures etc.The
link is here:
>
>  http://www.bsdstats.org/

It would help having the script in the NetBSD pkgsrc ?

Cheers,
   R

On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Riccardo Mottola wrote:

> Hey
>
> On Friday, September 22, 2006, at 02:08 PM, Bruce
O'Neel wrote:
>
> >
> > I've found an interesting page designed to spread
the word about *BSD's.
> > How many they are in use, which architectures
etc.The link is here:
> >
> >  http://www.bsdstats.org/
>
> It would help having the script in the NetBSD pkgsrc ?

I find this very useful. Maybe you make the port to ask for
setting up
also the required variables in /etc/rc.conf (IIRC).

Regards,

Johny.

At 13:25 Uhr +0200 26.9.2006, Gheorghe Ardelean wrote:
>> It would help having the script in the NetBSD
pkgsrc ?
>
>I find this very useful. Maybe you make the port to ask
for setting up
>also the required variables in /etc/rc.conf (IIRC).

On NetBSD, it should be called from /etc/monthly.local.
Overall, despite
the claims of supporting all *BSDs, the script is very
FreeBSD centric.

	hauke (the IIsi is la.causeuse.org ;)


--
"It's never straight up and down"     (DEVO)

Hauke Fath wrote:
> At 13:25 Uhr +0200 26.9.2006, Gheorghe Ardelean wrote:
>>> It would help having the script in the NetBSD
pkgsrc ?
>> I find this very useful. Maybe you make the port to
ask for setting up
>> also the required variables in /etc/rc.conf (IIRC).
> 
> On NetBSD, it should be called from /etc/monthly.local.
Overall, despite
> the claims of supporting all *BSDs, the script is very
FreeBSD centric.

What should the entry in monthly.local look like?  I tried
looking at 
the other /etc/*ly files, but they seem to have lots of
checks around 
them - presumably for good reasons.  Would this script need
that, or is 
it just a one-liner so that it gets run?


Tim

-- 
Tim & Alethea
christtrek.org

At 18:36 Uhr -0500 26.9.2006, Tim & Alethea Larson
wrote:
>> On NetBSD, it should be called from
/etc/monthly.local. Overall, despite
>> the claims of supporting all *BSDs, the script is
very FreeBSD centric.
>
>What should the entry in monthly.local look like?  I
tried looking at
>the other /etc/*ly files, but they seem to have lots of
checks around
>them - presumably for good reasons.  Would this script
need that, or is
>it just a one-liner so that it gets run?

Mine has

# $Id$
#
# Monthly tasks

if [ -f /usr/pkg/bin/pkgsurvey ]
then
    echo Submitting pkg inventory to pkgsrc.org
    /usr/pkg/bin/pkgsurvey
fi

# www.bsdstats.org
if [ -f /usr/local/sbin/bsdstats ]
then
    echo Submitting machine information to bsdstats.org
    /usr/local/sbin/bsdstats
fi

-- basically, you check if the script exists, and run it.

	hauke

--
"It's never straight up and down"     (DEVO)