how's 3.1?

On 2006/11/12, at 9:13, Hauke Fath wrote:

> At 19:35 Uhr +0100 11.11.2006, Marco Trillo wrote:
>> By the way, how does 4.99.3 run on mac68k ? What
about the GCC4  
>> speed ?
>
> It runs.  
>
> I have a Quadra 650 set up with -current, since I am
working on the
> timecounter MD bits. The machine has built a few
kernels without  
> problems,
> but I haven't timed gcc4 yet.

Hi,

Just my impression:
4.99.3 runs nicely on my Quadra800. Honestly, I don't use it
so much.
Using Gimp sometimes, and mainly it does cvs update and
making kernels.

4.99.3 is OK for such faster 040 which has plenty of Ram.



>>> What about the GCC4 speed ?


Please teach me, to use GCC4, "HAVE_GCC=4" in
/etc/mk.conf ?
Do I need it in 4.99.3 ? Without it means GCC3 ?
If YES, I have a data about speed.

Quadra800: (139MB/44Mhz): 4.99.3: source -current
build.sh tools
GCC3?	12 hours 56 min.
GCC4	12 hours 42 min.	

build.sh kernel (My conf, not GENERIC)
GCC3?	6 hours 25 min.
GCC4	6 hours 41 min.	

There is no difference.
So, I guess GCC4 runs by default in 4.99.3, wrong ?

LC630: (Full040/53MB/40MHz/IDE): 3.1.0_P: source
-rnetbsd-3-1
build.sh tools
GCC3	10 hours 31 min.

I was wondering, "Why LC630 is faster than Quadra800
??"
I think I get the answer.. NO ? 

Thanks,
Kazu Inanaga