Re: RC1 and framebuffer

Hauke Fath wrote:
> At 22:01 Uhr -0500 5.9.2007, Tim & Alethea Larson
wrote:
>> Ah, well, there's always 4.1.  
> 
> netbsd-5, more likely. Architectural changes are
usually not pulled up to
> release branches, both because of the work involved and
the potential
> destabilizing effect. While the mac68k framebuffer
support is a very nice
> thing to have, it's not like it fixes a bug.

I see; I did not know how things worked in a large project
like this.  I 
guess I will probably learn (at long last) how to roll my
own kernel.  


Tim
-- 
Tim & Alethea
christtrek.org