Greg Oster <oster cs.usask.ca> wrote:
> Tim & Alethea Larson writes:
> > What, no Mozilla? I've got
to chuckle at the idea of using some of
> > these on m68k...xscreensaver alone slows my box to
a crawl.
>
> "I tried"... but it said something about
not being available for m68k
> boxes :-/
The contention on this (mac68k) list has been that the issue
that once kept Mozilla/Firefox from running on m68k has been
resolved by Mozilla no longer using the problematic modules.
I traced back through the makefiles (where it mentions m68k
dumping core in the comments) and commented out the
restriction so I could try to build. Unfortunately I got a
linking error (IIRC) late in the process. I've been trying
to find someone else that could confirm this. This was
discussed on port-mac68k in January, IIRC. If we can
confirm this, the package maintainer could update the
makefiles. Personally I'd be most interested in the
firefox-gtk1 package, but if someone's successfully built
the gtk2 packages, that would be fine too.
> I certainly didn't see any SCSI issues on either of
the Q700's or my
> SE/30.. and they got into some very heavy paging in
those 40 days....
> (65MB processes on a 20MB machine isn't much fun :-} )
Hmmm, mac68k has had a number of reports of SCSI errors
during heavy load. This has kept me away from 3.0, since
2.1 seems very stable for me.
I have a Q840AV with 112MB and two drives that I use to
build.
> > Is there anything special required to build
generic m68k packages as
> > opposed to mac68k/amiga/next68k/etc packages?
>
> Nope.
That's great! So my personal archive (htt
p://christtrek.dyndns.org:8000/NetBSD/packages) could be
useful to more people.
Tim
--
Tim & Alethea
|