List Info

Thread: Re: yamt-idlelwp fallout for mips/cobalt?




Re: yamt-idlelwp fallout for mips/cobalt?
user name
2007-06-15 08:42:25
adNetBSD.org wrote:

> > so softintr(9) occurred (or was enabled) as soon
as
> > a kernel jumped to lwp_trampoline() before
lwp_startup()
> > was called.
> 
> Is this with or without your patch?

Without my patch.

With the patch (#ifdef'ed out PSL_LOWIPL), this doesn't
happen.
---
Izumi Tsustui

Re: yamt-idlelwp fallout for mips/cobalt?
user name
2007-07-17 09:11:24
I wrote:

> adNetBSD.org wrote:
> 
> > > so softintr(9) occurred (or was enabled) as
soon as
> > > a kernel jumped to lwp_trampoline() before
lwp_startup()
> > > was called.
> > 
> > Is this with or without your patch?
> 
> Without my patch.
> 
> With the patch (#ifdef'ed out PSL_LOWIPL), this doesn't
happen.

Is it okay to commit my patch?
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-mips/2007/05/25/000
0.html

The spl is lowered by spl0() in lwp_startup() which is
called
at the beginning of lwp_trampoline() anyway.
---
Izumi Tsutsui

Re: yamt-idlelwp fallout for mips/cobalt?
country flaguser name
United Kingdom
2007-07-18 08:26:20
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 11:11:24PM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui
wrote:

> Is it okay to commit my patch?
> http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-mips/2007/05/25/000
0.html

Please - I think we should just delete the line.

Thanks,
Andrew

[1-3]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )