On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 01:10:04PM -0400, Greg A. Woods;
Planix, Inc. wrote:
>
> Now as to the problem with your 10485760-byte file,
well that's easy
> to understand if you first take a peek at just how much
space has
> been allocated for that file (and keep in mind that
"du" shows disk
> usage, not file size) [use "stat -s"]. For
example when I create an
> exactly 10MB file I get a file that uses 20512
"blocks" (i.e. 512-
> byte-blocks) of disk space. If you multiply that back
out then the
> bytes of disk space used are 10502144, i.e.
10.015625MB, and so by
> the logic above that means that in 1MB units the file
does indeed use
> what must be counted as 11MB of disk space. This is of
course
> because the block size on the filesystem is 16KB, not
512B, and your
> 10MB file actually needs 623 filesystem(16KB) units of
allocation,
> i.e. it does actually use more than 10MB of filesystem
space.
The output of 'du' includes the indirect blocks, so will be
larger
than the filesize for non-trivial files without holes.
David
--
David Laight: david l8s.co.uk
|