HEAD UP acpi/mpbios/ioapic support commited

On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 09:45:07PM +0200, Pierrick Brossin
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 09:28:20PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer
wrote:
> > I'm not sure why you says the system finds only
one CPU, there's no
> > cpu-related info at all in this.
> 
> erm. Should I be able to see two cpus in `top` ?

Ha, no, not yet. The hypervisor itself will see all CPUs,
and can
schedule different domains on different CPUs. But a NetBSD
guest can
still use only one CPU for now.

-- 
Manuel Bouyer, LIP6, Universite Paris VI.          
Manuel.Bouyerlip6.fr
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la
difference
--

On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 09:45:07PM +0200, Pierrick
Brossin wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 09:28:20PM +0200, Manuel
Bouyer wrote:
>>> I'm not sure why you says the system finds only
one CPU, there's no
>>> cpu-related info at all in this.
>>
>> erm. Should I be able to see two cpus in `top` ?
>
> Ha, no, not yet. The hypervisor itself will see all
CPUs, and can
> schedule different domains on different CPUs. But a
NetBSD guest can
> still use only one CPU for now.

Oh, right.  the '1' was a problem I had with linux.  I was
confused; 
ignore me.

On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 09:45:07PM +0200, Pierrick
Brossin wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 09:28:20PM +0200, Manuel
Bouyer wrote:
>>> I'm not sure why you says the system finds only
one CPU, there's no
>>> cpu-related info at all in this.
>>
>> erm. Should I be able to see two cpus in `top` ?
>
> Ha, no, not yet. The hypervisor itself will see all
CPUs, and can
> schedule different domains on different CPUs. But a
NetBSD guest can
> still use only one CPU for now.

Oh, right.  the '1' was a problem I had with linux.  I was
confused; 
ignore me.