On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:17:10 +0200 Christoph Egger wrote:
> On Friday 14 September 2007 12:15:38 Sarton O'Brien
wrote:
[snip]
> > Umm ... which one is right??
> >
> > $ df /dev/wd0a
> > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail %Cap
Mounted on
> > /dev/wd0a 198831 45824 143066 24%
/
> >
> > $ dumpfs /dev/wd0a|grep -i ffs
> > cylgrp dynamic inodes 4.4BSD sblock FFSv2
fslevel 4
> >
> > $ scan_ffs /dev/wd0
> > Disk: WDC WD800JD-75M
> > Total sectors on disk: 156250000
> > FFSv1 at 63 size 410256, last mounted on /
> >
> > Now I'm just lost :P
> >
> > Seriously though is there something else I can use
to point the finger at
> > which one is wrong?
>
> dumpfs is correct. scan_ffs was imported from OpenBSD
at a time, there
> was no FFSv2 support in OpenBSD. Now OpenBSD supports
FFSv2.
> => scan_ffs needs re-imported.
The wd0a is FFSv1. scan_ffs shows correct info, and dumpfs
show that
inodes are 4.4BSD (which is FFSv1). Don't know why it show
superblock
as FFSv2 though. Well, I'm pretty sure that the following
command
should display the correct result:
dumpfs -s /dev/wd0a | grep '^magic'
--
Mishka.
|
