Postfix 2.4.1 broken in 4.0 beta2?

Is this the right group? We have current-users, but there
seems to be nothing like beta-users.

I may be doing something stupid, but since I updated two
machines to a more recent 4.0 beta2, Postfix keeps spitting
out messages like

postfix/qmgr[9301]: 886E1BF14E: from=<rootems.math.uni-bonn.de>, size=14087, nrcpt=0 (queue
active)
postfix/qmgr[9301]: warning: 886E1BF14E: rcpt count mismatch
(-1)
postfix/master[445]: warning: process
/usr/libexec/postfix/qmgr pid 9301 killed by signal 11
postfix/master[445]: warning: /usr/libexec/postfix/qmgr: bad
command startup -- throttling

Can anyone confirm problems like this? Or can anyone confirm
that Postfix 2.4.1 works in 4.0 beta2?

The build is a 4.0_BETA2 CVS update from Monday plus
hannken's dq_cnt patch (that being the reason to update)
plus fvdl's IOAPIC workaround.

Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 12:34:30PM +0200, Edgar Fu?:
> Is this the right group? We have current-users, but
there seems to be nothing like beta-users.
> 
> I may be doing something stupid, but since I updated
two machines to a more recent 4.0 beta2, Postfix keeps
spitting out messages like
> 
> postfix/qmgr[9301]: 886E1BF14E: from=<rootems.math.uni-bonn.de>, size=14087, nrcpt=0 (queue
active)
> postfix/qmgr[9301]: warning: 886E1BF14E: rcpt count
mismatch (-1)
> postfix/master[445]: warning: process
/usr/libexec/postfix/qmgr pid 9301 killed by signal 11
> postfix/master[445]: warning:
/usr/libexec/postfix/qmgr: bad command startup --
throttling
> 
> Can anyone confirm problems like this? Or can anyone
confirm that Postfix 2.4.1 works in 4.0 beta2?
> 
> The build is a 4.0_BETA2 CVS update from Monday plus
hannken's dq_cnt patch (that being the reason to update)
plus fvdl's IOAPIC workaround.

I have no such problems, but on current.  I'll have to
install 4b2.  Is this
i386 or amd64?  Is this queued message old/stagnant,
possibly created by the
previous version of postfix?  Does postcat read it?