Re: Upgrading in-tree OpenSSL to 0.9.9-current

On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:38:16 -0400
nathanwMIT.EDU (Nathan J. Williams) wrote:

> "Steven M. Bellovin" <smbcs.columbia.edu> writes:
> 
> > On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:38:12 -0400
> > Thor Lancelot Simon <tlsrek.tjls.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I figure, it's NetBSD-current, so including
OpenSSL-current is not
> >> such a big deal.  And I will try to keep up to
date as there are
> >> major changes in OpenSSL through 0.9.9 -- if
in fact there are any.
> >> 
> >> Opinions?
> >> 
> > Makes sense to me -- it is, as you say, -current.
> 
> I don't have any particular problem with Thor's plan,
but this general
> line of reasoning seems wrong; we'll want to release at
some point,
> and then it could become kind of annoying to ship a
non-released
> version of OpenSSL.
> 
And the odds of us shipping before they do?


		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbi
a.edu/~smb