List Info

Thread: Re: ip_conntrack growing indefinitely




Re: ip_conntrack growing indefinitely
country flaguser name
United Kingdom
2007-08-11 05:19:08
Hi there,

On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 fd4 wrote:

> > For now it has been patched setting
ip_conntrack_max to 65536 but
> > connections still grow indefinitely (seems NAT
never drops old
> > connections). Any idea of the reasons? Could be
related with the
> > kernel version (2 years old) we're running?
>
> I've a similar phenomen using kernel
2.6.18-4-vserver-686 :
> conntrack -L|wc -l
> 3340
> nearly all started at a similar time from two ports to
random
>
> example iptstate:
> Source Destination   Proto  State       TTL
> 1.2.3.4:42573 1.2.3.4:842 tcp ESTABLISHED 10:44:43
> 1.2.3.4:42574 1.2.3.4:1501 tcp ESTABLISHED 10:43:51
> 1.2.3.4:42573 1.2.3.4:1392 tcp ESTABLISHED 10:43:20
>
> well :- on my wish list now something like that:
> conntrack -D -s 1.2.3.4 -d 1.2.3.4 -p tcp
--orig-port-src 42573 --orig-port-dst *

I don't think it grows indefinitely.  The timeout is five
days.

http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/n
etfilter-devel/2005-June/020081.html

--

73,
Ged.


Re: ip_conntrack growing indefinitely
country flaguser name
Germany
2007-08-12 01:23:15
Am Sat, 11 Aug 2007 11:19:08 +0100 (BST)
schrieb "G.W. Haywood" <gedjubileegroup.co.uk>:

> I don't think it grows indefinitely.  The timeout is
five days.

about 11 hrs in that case 
(of course I've reduced the standard value)

and I've said a similar case - just wondering, cleaned it
with conntrack -F

the growing to more than 3300 entries has started by an
unknown local event triggering conntrack on local
connections; I could not find any reason in the logs or
somehow else. happened within a minute or 2 from 2 local
ports


[1-2]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )