PATCH-O-MATIC (installation issue)

I am so stupid, I didnt realize that by simply downloading
the package that
was the IPTABLES source directory, however when I run the
runme it asks if i
want to patch but when I say yes to any of them it tells me
it is missing
files.. Any ideas?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rob Sterenborg" <robsterenborg.info>
To: <netfilterlists.netfilter.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 1:25 PM
Subject: RE: PATCH-O-MATIC (installation issue)


> > I can find the kernerl source but I cannot seem to
find the iptables
> > source, and when I point it to the same location
as my linux kernel
> > it fails saying it doesnt know the IPTABLES
source, does this make
> > sense, and thank you for following up!
>
> Ah, yes you did write that.. Sorry about that.
> All sources are separate packages. I don't know if you
have installed
> the iptables source.
> However, I'd recommend to download the source of both
iptables and POM
> snapshots from the ftp site of the Netfilter project as
you can download
> more up-to-date sources.
>
>
> Gr,
> Rob
>
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Rob Sterenborg" <robsterenborg.info>
> > To: <netfilterlists.netfilter.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 1:15 PM
> > Subject: RE: PATCH-O-MATIC (installation issue)
> >
> >
> >>> I am new to the forum so hopefully I am
doing this right, I am
> >>> trying to install PATCH-O-MATIC on either
RedHat or CentOS but I
> >>> dont know where the iptables source
installation is, sorry if this
> >>> is posted elsewhere..
> >>
> >> If you installed the kernel source (it's a
package), you probably
> >> find it in /usr/src
> >>
> >>
> >> Gr,
> >> Rob
>
>
>
> -- 
> IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of  the
individual
> addressee(s) named above and may contain information
that is
> confidential, privileged or unsuitable for overly
sensitive persons
> with low self-esteem, no sense of humour or irrational
religious
> beliefs. If you are not  the intended recipient, any
dissemination,
> distribution or copying of this email is not
> authorised (either explicitly or implicitly) and
constitutes an
> irritating social faux pas. Unless the word
absquatulation has been
> used in its correct context somewhere other than in
this warning, it
> does not have any legal or grammatical use and may be
ignored. No
> animals were harmed in the transmission of this email,
although the
> yorkshire terrier next door is living on borrowed time,
let me tell
> you. Those of you with an overwhelming fear of the
unknown will be
> gratified to learn that there is no hidden message
revealed by reading
> this warning backwards, so just ignore that Alert
Notice from
> Microsoft: However, by pouring a complete circle of
salt around
> yourself and your computer you can ensure that no harm
befalls you and
> your pets. If you have received this email in error,
please add some
> nutmeg and egg whites and place it in a warm oven for
40 minutes. Whisk
> briefly and let it stand for 2 hours before icing.
>
>
>