Dear All,
What is bi-casting? Thanks
Joseph
-----Original Message-----
From: netlmm-admin ngnet.it [mailto:netlmm-adminngnet.it]
On Behalf Of
Narayanan, Vidya
Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2006 6:26 AM
To: Mohamed Khalil; Alexandru Petrescu
Cc: James Kempf; Von-Hugo, Dirk; wanghuiresearch.nec.com.cn;
netlmmngnet.it
Subject: RE: [netlmm] bicasting & Multicasting
Hi Mohamed,
I do think that bi-casting should not be a feature supported
by default with
the make-before-break support being discussed. The main
support that is
needed is that the LMA be able to accept packets from the MN
coming via two
different ARs. Again, that would be indicated by a flag and
hence is not a
default operation either.
Thanks,
Vidya
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netlmm-adminngnet.it [mailto:netlmm-adminngnet.it]
On Behalf
> Of Mohamed Khalil
> Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 10:48 AM
> To: Alexandru Petrescu; Narayanan, Vidya
> Cc: James Kempf; Von-Hugo, Dirk; wanghuiresearch.nec.com.cn;
> netlmmngnet.it
> Subject: [netlmm] bicasting & Multicasting
>
> Hi All,
>
> few years ago the MIPv6 discussed the option of doing
bicasting at L3
> from the HA. After long discussion they decided that
they will not
> adopt this feature because it has an impact on the
performance of some
> protocols such as ROHC & TCP and others. before we
decide to include
> this feature in LMM, I think it will be useful to know
why MIP6
> rejected this option.
>
> MK
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netlmm mailing list
> netlmmngnet.it
> https://vesuvio.ipv6.cselt.it/mailman/listinfo/netlmm
>
_______________________________________________
netlmm mailing list
netlmmngnet.it
https://vesuvio.ipv6.cselt.it/mailman/listinfo/netlmm
_______________________________________________
netlmm mailing list
netlmmngnet.it
https://vesuvio.ipv6.cselt.it/mailman/listinfo/netlmm
|