Conclusion of discussion on Issue #44: Add goal to support make before break handover

Vidya,

The point is - we are looking for new viewpoints.

            jak

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Narayanan, Vidya" <vidyanqualcomm.com>
To: "James Kempf" <kempfdocomolabs-usa.com>; <netlmmngnet.it>
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 2:50 PM
Subject: RE: [netlmm] Conclusion of discussion on Issue #44:
Add goal to 
support make before break handover


Hi James,

>
> *Please note this important qualifier. Email addresses
from
> the same institution of people who have already
expressed a
> strong opinion one way or the other will be discounted.
I
> want to hear genuinely new opinions, not attempts to
force
> the concensus in a particular direction through volume.
>

I am not sure when institution or affliation of people
started factoring
in IETF consensus/decisions, but a question nevertheless -
what if
someone had a different viewpoint or disagreed with someone
else from
the same institution? Would you want to hear the opinion
then? Or, what
if someone sent an email from an address that did not belong
to their
organization?

I understand your point about attempts to force consensus,
but the
policy seems flawed.

Regards,
Vidya


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Narayanan, Vidya" <vidyanqualcomm.com>
> To: "James Kempf" <kempfdocomolabs-usa.com>; <netlmmngnet.it>
> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 12:49 PM
> Subject: RE: [netlmm] Conclusion of discussion on Issue
#44:
> Add goal to support make before break handover
>
>
> I think this one took a lot of discussion in
understanding
> the goal itself and its implications - but, I don't
think
> what was discussed reflects any consensus either way
(adding
> or not adding)...
>
> So, I think the question still remains open, given all
the discussion.
> It may be good to post a specific question asking
people's
> opinion on adding/not adding the goal and giving
another
> couple of days.
>
> Thanks,
> Vidya
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: James Kempf [mailto:kempfdocomolabs-usa.com]
> > Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 11:45 AM
> > To: Narayanan, Vidya; netlmmngnet.it
> > Subject: Re: [netlmm] Conclusion of discussion on
Issue #44:
> > Add goal to support make before break handover
> >
> > There was a lot of opinion on both sides of the
issue. I
> don't see any
> > concensus to put this goal into the draft.
> > Perhaps I should have phrased it as "lack of
concensus to put this
> > goal into the draft"?
> >
> >             jak
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Narayanan, Vidya"
<vidyanqualcomm.com>
> > To: "James Kempf" <kempfdocomolabs-usa.com>; <netlmmngnet.it>
> > Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 11:40 AM
> > Subject: RE: [netlmm] Conclusion of discussion on
Issue #44:
> > Add goal to support make before break handover
> >
> >
> > Hi James,
> > Just curious - how do you conclude this as the
rough
> consensus? There
> > have been a lot of email on this topic, but
generally, I read the
> > overall opinion as "can be done" - so,
I'm trying to
> understand what I
> > missed.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Vidya
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: netlmm-adminngnet.it
[mailto:netlmm-adminngnet.it]
> > On Behalf
> > > Of James Kempf
> > > Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 11:06 AM
> > > To: James Kempf; netlmmngnet.it
> > > Subject: [netlmm] Conclusion of discussion on
Issue #44:
> > Add goal to
> > > support make before break handover
> > >
> > > Today concludes the discussion on Issue #44.
The WG rough
> concensus
> > > was not to add this as a requirement to the
REQ draft, so I
> > will close
> > > the issue.
> > >
> > >             jak
> > >
> > >
> > >
_______________________________________________
> > > netlmm mailing list
> > > netlmmngnet.it
> > > https://vesuvio.ipv6.cselt.it/mailman/listinfo/netlmm
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>


_______________________________________________
netlmm mailing list
netlmmngnet.it
https://vesuvio.ipv6.cselt.it/mailman/listinfo/netlmm