New documentation system

Hi,

   Could you please guys take a look at this bug and tell me
if you
   know some documentation system similar to what we have
been talking
   so far:

      http:
//www.cherokee-project.com/bugs/ticket/136

   It seems like the best of the approaches to get ride of
the current
   Wiki and distribution systems.

-- 
Greetings, alo.
http://www.alobbs.com
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
Cherokeecherokee-project.com
http://cherokee-project.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf
o/cherokee

Andres Vargas - zodman wrote, On 17/03/07 07:01:

 >        Could you please guys take a look at this bug
and tell me if
 >        you know some documentation system similar to
what we have
 >        been talking so far:
 >
 >           http:
//www.cherokee-project.com/bugs/ticket/136
 >
 >        It seems like the best of the approaches to get
ride of the
 >        current Wiki and distribution systems.
 >
 > im thing the best way to write documentation and
contrib with
 > documentation is writen on wiki

   I would agree with you if we weren't suffered spamming
problems and
   defaces previously. (damn it! we won't buy your
ring-tones; not now,
   not ever, so stop messing!)

   Besides, it's kind of difficult to extract its content
and convert
   it to a different format..

   With the wiki we gain simplicity, but the "text in
the repository"
   system we would gain flexibility and in some sense
security.

   So.. what do you guys think of it?  We're still on time
for making a
   decision for 0.6 

-- 
Greetings, alo.
http://www.alobbs.com
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
Cherokeecherokee-project.com
http://cherokee-project.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf
o/cherokee

Alvaro Lopez Ortega dijo [Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 12:55:30PM
+0100]:
>    I would agree with you if we weren't suffered
spamming problems and
>    defaces previously. (damn it! we won't buy your
ring-tones; not now,
>    not ever, so stop messing!)
> 
>    Besides, it's kind of difficult to extract its
content and convert
>    it to a different format..
> 
>    With the wiki we gain simplicity, but the "text
in the repository"
>    system we would gain flexibility and in some sense
security.
> 
>    So.. what do you guys think of it?  We're still on
time for making a
>    decision for 0.6 

Well, with ikiwiki you can have a Wiki backed on SVN 

Greetings,

-- 
Gunnar Wolf - gwolfgwolf.org - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23
Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973  F800 D80E F35A 8BB5
27AF
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
Cherokeecherokee-project.com
http://cherokee-project.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf
o/cherokee

Alvaro Lopez Ortega dijo [Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 12:55:30PM
+0100]:
>    I would agree with you if we weren't suffered
spamming problems and
>    defaces previously. (damn it! we won't buy your
ring-tones; not now,
>    not ever, so stop messing!)
> 
>    Besides, it's kind of difficult to extract its
content and convert
>    it to a different format..
> 
>    With the wiki we gain simplicity, but the "text
in the repository"
>    system we would gain flexibility and in some sense
security.
> 
>    So.. what do you guys think of it?  We're still on
time for making a
>    decision for 0.6 

Well, with ikiwiki you can have a Wiki backed on SVN 

Greetings,

-- 
Gunnar Wolf - gwolfgwolf.org - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23
Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973  F800 D80E F35A 8BB5
27AF
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
Cherokeecherokee-project.com
http://cherokee-project.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf
o/cherokee