R: benchmarks and another questions

----Messaggio originale----
Da: DXpublicatelefonica.net
Data: 27-apr-
2007 1.38 PM
A: <cherokeelists.alobbs.com>
Ogg: [Cherokee] benchmarks 
and another questions

> Hi,
> 
> I just want to make a question: can 
you update your benchmarks 
> (http://www.cherokee-proj
ect.
com/benchmarks) and compare with another 
> web server (lighttpd for 
example and another light web browswer)?

Well, right now it would be 
more useful to compare 0.6 trunk with 0.5.6
to evaluate how much trunk 
has progressed in the last 12 months.

Upcoming Cherokee 0.6.0 might be 
compared against lighttpd and Apache,
but only to give numbers of how 
much we have to work for Cherokee 0.7.x.

> I think that it could be a 
launch for the 0.6 future version.

0.6.0 will be another step ahead in 
the development
toward 1.0.0 version but, of course, it will not be the 
"perfect version".

Right now trunk 0.6 has a few known pending issues 
(related to very corner cases)
which are being slowly resolved (we are 
all busy in other things ;
I guess that upcoming 0.6.0-beta2 (ready 
within 2-3 weeks ?)
will have patches for them.

What I can say is that 
0.6.0 will be noticeably faster (+ 15% - 20%)
than 0.5.6.

> And 
please, I suggest you put the code of how you did this
benchmarks

Agreed.

> I like cherokee and I think it's a undervalued.

This is not 
necessarily a bad thing, at least for 0.6.x,
maybe things will change a 
lot with future 0.7.x and 0.8.x.

                               
Greetings.



--
A. De Faccio
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
Cherokeecherokee-project.com
http://cherokee-project.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf
o/cherokee

En/na adefacctin.it ha escrit:
> 
> ----Messaggio originale----
> Da: DXpublicatelefonica.net
> Data: 27-apr-
> 2007 1.38 PM
> A: <cherokeelists.alobbs.com>
> Ogg: [Cherokee] benchmarks 
> and another questions
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just want to make a question: can 
> you update your benchmarks 
>> (http://www.cherokee-proj
ect.
> com/benchmarks) and compare with another 
>> web server (lighttpd for 
> example and another light web browswer)?
> 
> Well, right now it would be 
> more useful to compare 0.6 trunk with 0.5.6
> to evaluate how much trunk 
> has progressed in the last 12 months.
> 

Yes. It could be easy to show the improve of versions.
Overall for 
people who only believe they see

> Upcoming Cherokee 0.6.0 might be 
> compared against lighttpd and Apache,
> but only to give numbers of how 
> much we have to work for Cherokee 0.7.x.
> 

Or you could compare 0.7.x-beta too

>> I think that it could be a 
> launch for the 0.6 future version.
> 
> 0.6.0 will be another step ahead in 
> the development
> toward 1.0.0 version but, of course, it will not be the

> "perfect version".
> 
> Right now trunk 0.6 has a few known pending issues 
> (related to very corner cases)
> which are being slowly resolved (we are 
> all busy in other things ;
> I guess that upcoming 0.6.0-beta2 (ready 
> within 2-3 weeks ?)
> will have patches for them.
> 
> What I can say is that 
> 0.6.0 will be noticeably faster (+ 15% - 20%)
> than 0.5.6.
> 
>> And 
> please, I suggest you put the code of how you did this
benchmarks
> 
> Agreed.
> 
>> I like cherokee and I think it's a undervalued.
> 
> This is not 
> necessarily a bad thing, at least for 0.6.x,
> maybe things will change a 
> lot with future 0.7.x and 0.8.x.
> 

Well, always that people knows it and use it it's better I
think

Thanks,
Xan.

PS: I hope I will see soon this benchmarks.... 
>                                
> Greetings.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> A. De Faccio

_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
Cherokeecherokee-project.com
http://cherokee-project.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf
o/cherokee