Stefan de Konink wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2 May 2008, Jack wrote:
>
> > The test also seems to have revealed a memory
leak. When the test was
> > done, cherokee process took about 100MB memory (it
started with
> > 2.5MB.) I wasn't sure if the leak was from static
requests or dynamic
> > requests. So I re-did 10,000 request with a static
page, and didn't
> > observe memory leak. In the dynamic page tests,
memory usage kept
> > growing, at the speed of around 100 bytes per
request. When the load
> > stopped, the memory didn't get released.
>
> VERY GOOD! I'm happy you found it! I think this
accounts for my previous
> problems too.
>
> > Not sure if this has also been observed on Linux?
>
> Yes, under Linux this was also found. I only don't know
if it was a
> memoryleak resulting in high load (due to swapping) or
something else.
OK, but version 0.5.4 is a bit stale to perform meaningful
tests on it.
Doing them on last 0.6.x o trunk 0.7 would be much more
appreciated.
--
Nick Name: A.D.F.
E-Mail: <adefacc () tin ! it>
E-Mail-Format: Plain Text only (please); view using font
Courier New
--
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
Cherokee cherokee-project.com
http://cherokee-project.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf
o/cherokee
|
