Hi Aparna, I migrated with this continuous build of Chandler
(after
initially running into the same problem I think that
Priscilla did with
the initially recommended checkpoint build):
Chandler_win_debug_0.7.dev-r14328-20070516104911.exe
Thanks, Andre
On Wed, 16 May 2007 15:51:56 -0700, "Aparna
Kadakia"
<aparna osafoundation.org> said:
> Hi Andre,
> Thank you for taking the leap here on migrating your
data to Chandler
> Hub.
> Your feedback is greatly appreciated.
>
> See my comments inline:
>
> On May 16, 2007, at 3:26 PM, Andre Mueninghoff wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> > I've migrated successfully to Chander Hub. It was
a relatively
> > seamless
> > process. The only very minor issues I would raise
are 1) Chandler
> > (debug
> > build r14228 on WinXP) is not (hasn't for awhile)
displaying the
> > sharing
> > type icon next to the collection name unless one
selects a collection
> > and then the sharing icon for only that collection
is displayed (if
> > there is one to display). This just means that I
have to highlight
> > collection names one by one to verify the
unsubscribe from osaf.us and
> > the publish to hub.chandlerproject.org.
> Yes, it's a blocker bug currently.
> https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8791
>
> > Might be good to mention this in
> > the migration instructions.
> Good point. If the bug is not resolved by the time we
are ready to
> migrate the dogfooders we will document it clearly in
the migration
> instructions. Thank you for pointing that out.
>
> > 2) The same Chandler is not (hasn't for
> > awhile) displaying the build number in the About
dialogue. Might
> > interfere with verification of the Chandler one is
using. Maybe these
> > are debug build issues only.
>
> There is already an open bug about the version number
not displaying
> in the continous builds.
> https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8747
>
> Andre, can you tell me whether you are using a
checkpoint build or a
> continuous build?
> Or if you post the contents of your version.py that
will tell us for
> sure.
>
> > Congrats on releasing Cosmo 0.6.1 and
> > EIMML. I think it would fair to characterize the
difference between
> > the
> > previous DAV sync speed and the new EIMML sync
speed as the difference
> > between impulse power and warp power. 
> > Best regards, Andre
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 15 May 2007 22:35:59 -0700, "Aparna
Kadakia"
> > <aparnaosafoundation.org> said:
> >> Hello everyone,
> >> This is a reminder about tomorrow's IRC QA
session at 11:00 AM PDT in
> >> #cosmo channel.
> >> We will be focussing on getting the internal
dogfooders to migrate
> >> their data from osaf.us to Chandler Hub which
is now on our newly
> >> released Cosmo 0.6.1 release.
> >>
> >> Here are the instructions for the end-users
migrating their data from
> >> [osaf.us+DAV] sharing to
[hub.chandlerproject.org+EIM] sharing.
> >> http://wiki.osafoundation.org/Projects/DavToEimMi
grationUserDoc
> >>
> >> Part of the objective of the test session is
to also validate the
> >> steps identified in the document. The document
supports both a4 and
> >> trunk users looking to migrate their data to
the new server.
> >>
> >> The Chandler Checkpoint build that is
recommended in the migration
> >> instructions is r14323 and can be downloaded
at:
> >> http://downloads.osafoundation.org/chandler/snaps
hots/20070515/
> >>
> >> Again, we will be conducting this session in
the #cosmo channel at
> >> 11:00 AM PDT.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Aparna
> >> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> >>
> >> Open Source Applications Foundation
"chandler-dev" mailing list
> >> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chan
dler-dev
>
_______________________________________________
cosmo-dev mailing list
cosmo-devlists.osafoundation.org
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmo-d
ev
|