List Info

Thread: Recommended backend for Replication Config examples?




Recommended backend for Replication Config examples?
country flaguser name
United Kingdom
2007-06-27 04:30:55
Dear All,

For the backend type for all the replication examples I'm
doing just now,
should we use bdb or hdb?

I notice that in slapd.conf.default we are using bdb.

Thoughts?

Gavin.

-- 
Kind Regards,

Gavin Henry.
Managing Director.

T +44 (0) 1224 279484
M +44 (0) 7930 323266
F +44 (0) 1224 824887
E ghenrysuretecsystems.com

Open Source. Open Solutions(tm).

http://www.suretecsyst
ems.com/



Re: Recommended backend for Replication Config examples?
country flaguser name
United States
2007-06-27 05:23:50
Gavin Henry wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
> For the backend type for all the replication examples
I'm doing just now,
> should we use bdb or hdb?
> 
> I notice that in slapd.conf.default we are using bdb.

I'm in no hurry to deprecate back-bdb, and back-hdb's
initial performance is 
heavily dependent on priming its IDL cache. It's a tossup -
back-bdb with no 
subtree renames but less cache sensitivity, or back-hdb with
full directory 
semantics and more cache sensitivity. I suspect we'll be
carrying both for a 
long time, because of this tradeoff.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Gavin.
> 


-- 
   -- Howard Chu
   Chief Architect, Symas Corp.  http://www.symas.com
   Director, Highland Sun        http://highlandsun.com/hy
c/
   Chief Architect, OpenLDAP     http://www.openldap.
org/project/

Re: Recommended backend for Replication Config examples?
country flaguser name
United Kingdom
2007-06-27 05:58:20
<quote who="Howard Chu">
> Gavin Henry wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> For the backend type for all the replication
examples I'm doing just
>> now,
>> should we use bdb or hdb?
>>
>> I notice that in slapd.conf.default we are using
bdb.
>
> I'm in no hurry to deprecate back-bdb, and back-hdb's
initial performance
> is
> heavily dependent on priming its IDL cache. It's a
tossup - back-bdb with
> no
> subtree renames but less cache sensitivity, or back-hdb
with full
> directory
> semantics and more cache sensitivity. I suspect we'll
be carrying both for
> a
> long time, because of this tradeoff.

Understood. I'll stick with back-bdb for the examples,
unless the backend
is required to be changed for a specific example.

Thanks.

>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Gavin.
>>
>
>
> --
>    -- Howard Chu
>    Chief Architect, Symas Corp.  http://www.symas.com
>    Director, Highland Sun        http://highlandsun.com/hy
c/
>    Chief Architect, OpenLDAP     http://www.openldap.
org/project/
>


[1-3]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )