|
List Info
Thread: RE: What does each SPAM hit mean?
|
|
| RE: What does each SPAM hit mean? |
  United States |
2007-07-18 00:25:01 |
|
|
Thanks Chris. BTW, just to add to your
morning office fun, we have a Chris in our office. So Patrick
has taken to calling you Chris P, to different. However he pronounces
Crispy. So we have taken that little joke to the extreme by saying things
like "...have you gotten a response from burnt boy yet..."
::>
All smiles.
Thanks, now I know where to look.
ab
*** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***
This message and any attached files
are for the designated recipient only and may contain abcISP, Inc. privileged,
proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any dissemination,
distribution, copying or any other use of this message is strictly
prohibited.
*** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
***
The Traditions of the
Church are the Teachings of Christ
From: Support Surgemail CP
[mailto:surgemail-support netwinsite.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 17,
2007 6:43 PM To: surgemail-list netwinsite.com; Alex
Barron Subject: Re: [SurgeMail List] What does each SPAM hit
mean?
Alex Barron wrote:
malcolm.abcispinc
type="cite">
I am
tightening my SPAM settings, and watching my log very carefully. I
realize that I do not know what most of my log is telling me. Also I
don't have an easy reference guide that says if a legitimate email is getting
hit with x or y, which configuration do I look too. I searched the
Netwin site, the manual and the SurgeMail mailing list, but didn't find what
these entries mean.
Does any
one know what each of these settings mean? I would also like to know if
any one knows which settings control each of these, but that is
secondary. Below seem to be the common entries in the
log. FYI, You can look in
'aspam_mfilter.txt' for these and see what logic is applied in each case (well
for most of them anyway)
malcolm.abcispinc
type="cite">
From4consonants=0.5 The username contains
four non vowels in a row, which is 'rare' in english.
malcolm.abcispinc
type="cite">
GreyPassed=1.0
The messages was grey list blocked and
then the sending server resent.
malcolm.abcispinc
type="cite">
Price &
DodgySrc=1.0
DodgySource=2.0,
SPF
Default Fail=2.5 (above 3) The
source ip address was not verifiable via spf and other mechanisms
malcolm.abcispinc
type="cite">
X-Verify-Failed
present=2.0, The return address could not be
verified.
malcolm.abcispinc
type="cite">
combo mx and smtp and
from=2.0, A combination of three headers all
suggesting the source may be invalid.
malcolm.abcispinc
type="cite">
X-Verify-SMTP
present=0.6, Couldn't connect back to sending
server on port 25
malcolm.abcispinc
type="cite">
X-Verify-MX
present=1.6" The sending server wasn't a close
match to any of the mx records.
malcolm.abcispinc
type="cite">
SpamUrl=4.1 Found a
url in the message in a list of bad urls. Send message to 'your.domain">notspam your.domain' to correct if this is
not spam.
malcolm.abcispinc
type="cite">
Aspam=-0.8 The
score from the best match in aspam list of messages isspam/notspam...
malcolm.abcispinc
type="cite">
NakedCR=0.2 Message
contained a naked 'cr' character, instead of 'crlf'
malcolm.abcispinc
type="cite">
SPF Soft=3.0 A soft
spf failure, so spf failed but the spf rule said 'don't be too mean'
malcolm.abcispinc
type="cite">
ImageSize=3.0 The
message appears to contain an image of a suspicious nature.
malcolm.abcispinc
type="cite">
Also, I was
trying to figure out how "busy" we are as an ISP (actually as a IT service
provider, but hey). We process on average 500 emails per hour. Is
that small, tiny not worthy of posting to the list or a decent sized
ISP? Hard to answer, I've seen servers on
occasion running at thirty times that. But those are probably different
business models entirely so not really relevant for comparison.
ChrisP.
|
[1]
|
|
|
about | contact Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )
|