List Info

Thread: load: Invalid ini setting (g_friends_pending_novanish)




load: Invalid ini setting (g_friends_pending_novanish)
country flaguser name
United States
2007-08-31 17:51:45
Just upgraded from 3.7b6-6 to 3.8k4-4, during the install of
the upgrade 
I got this at the command line:

load: Invalid ini setting (g_friends_pending_novanish)

The rest of the install appears to have gone fine and it
started back up.

Any idea why this error would occur?

I am now off to look up this setting and see what it's
currently set to.


Regards,
Todd Routhier

Lightwave Technologies, LLC

http://www.PrestigeM
essaging.com
http://www.YourOwnISP.com
 
--
Within the US:
(888) 904-8477

Outside the US:
+1-210-881-0600



Delivery expired
country flaguser name
United States
2007-09-01 13:11:26
Someone from Tascali.co.uk is getting this message when
trying to email one 
of our customers.  What can be wrong?

Message to help***elkgrovenet undeliverable
5.4.7 delivery expired - message too old (default)  -
connection lost.

Thanks in advance

K 



list serve virus scans
country flaguser name
United States
2007-09-01 18:15:30
I have a feeling this is a setting that I have simply not
discovered. 
Problem is this:

Customer sends out a mailing list note. Surgemail of course
gets the 
note and sends (attempts to send) to each member of that
list. That's 
good so far. Problem I see - is that my virus scanner
(clamav) is 
being called to scan each transmission of the message. The
scan only 
needs to happen once. That would be when the original
message arrives 
from the sender.... As you might imagine - a pile of virus
scan 
processes running - when dlist is working a large list - can
make 
your mailserver sweat abit....


Am I missing something?

thanks in advance,

Ken




============================================================
===========
Ken Hunter, Owner
Aspiring Technologies
Nokesville, Virginia
703.596.4353

+ Internet Hosting Services
   -> Website hosting
   -> Domain hosting
   -> Email services (mailboxes, forwarding, mailing
lists, etc).
   -> Server co-location (send us your server or have us
build one for you).
   -> Internet connectivity (frame relay, dedicated
circuits)

+ Hosting located in Nokesville Virginia area.

============================================================
===========



Re: list serve virus scans
country flaguser name
New Zealand
2007-09-02 21:18:27

surgemail-listnetwinsite.com wrote:
> I have a feeling this is a setting that I have simply
not discovered. 
> Problem is this:
> 
> Customer sends out a mailing list note. Surgemail of
course gets the 
> note and sends (attempts to send) to each member of
that list. That's 
> good so far. Problem I see - is that my virus scanner
(clamav) is being 
> called to scan each transmission of the message. The
scan only needs to 
> happen once. That would be when the original message
arrives from the 
> sender.... As you might imagine - a pile of virus scan
processes running 
> - when dlist is working a large list - can make your
mailserver sweat 
> abit....
> 
> 
> Am I missing something?
> 
> thanks in advance,
> 
> Ken
> 
> 

Set g_vpipe_skip "127.0.0.1"

That will whitelist messages coming from that ip.

Regards,
Stuart


> 
> 
>
============================================================
===========
> Ken Hunter, Owner
> Aspiring Technologies
> Nokesville, Virginia
> 703.596.4353
> 
> + Internet Hosting Services
>   -> Website hosting
>   -> Domain hosting
>   -> Email services (mailboxes, forwarding, mailing
lists, etc).
>   -> Server co-location (send us your server or have
us build one for you).
>   -> Internet connectivity (frame relay, dedicated
circuits)
> 
> + Hosting located in Nokesville Virginia area.
> 
>
============================================================
===========
> 
> 


-- 
When replying please quote original message to save time and
always let
us know what OS and version of SurgeMail you are using.

************************************************************
****************
If you wish to communicate with other users and talk about
SurgeMail and
also get news about updates etc then join the SurgeMail
List.
Send an email to surgemail-list-requestnetwinsite.com with only 
"subscribe" in the message body

FAQ - http
://www.netwinsite.com/surgemail/help/faq.htm
************************************************************
**************** 



Re: Delivery expired
country flaguser name
New Zealand
2007-09-03 20:20:15

Case Hugo wrote:
> Someone from Tascali.co.uk is getting this message when
trying to email 
> one of our customers.  What can be wrong?
> 
> Message to help***elkgrovenet undeliverable
> 5.4.7 delivery expired - message too old (default)  -
connection lost.
> 
> Thanks in advance
> 
> K
> 

I have never seen that before on a mail server.  I would
assume there is 
some filter checking the date headers or something.  I would
check these 
are correct.  It is not an error that SurgeMail produces so
there is 
something else sending it..

Regards,
Stuart

-- 
When replying please quote original message to save time and
always let
us know what OS and version of SurgeMail you are using.

************************************************************
****************
If you wish to communicate with other users and talk about
SurgeMail and
also get news about updates etc then join the SurgeMail
List.
Send an email to surgemail-list-requestnetwinsite.com with only 
"subscribe" in the message body

FAQ - http
://www.netwinsite.com/surgemail/help/faq.htm
************************************************************
**************** 



X-Verify-Helo
country flaguser name
United States
2007-09-03 20:43:49
Why does the X-Verify-Helo header sometimes/always show Lookup Failed, wanted <ip address>;
I cannot filter on this header if it's not returning correct answers.
What does this header do and what should the responses be?
 
When you goto Find the config setting 'helo', it returns "spam control" page.... but there are so many sections on the Spam Control page to look...
and I cannot find any listings on the Spam Control page with g_helo in it.
Wazzup?
 
Are the docs & Find function in the admin control panel correctly programmed for Helo?
 
BarryZ
 
Re: X-Verify-Helo
country flaguser name
New Zealand
2007-09-03 21:44:27

webmaster1usa.com wrote:
> Why does the X-Verify-Helo header sometimes/always show
Lookup Failed, 
> wanted <ip address>
> I cannot filter on this header if it's not returning
correct answers.
> What does this header do and what should the responses
be?
>  
> When you goto Find the config setting 'helo', it
returns "spam control" 
> page.... but there are so many sections on the Spam
Control page to look...
> and I cannot find any listings on the Spam Control page
with g_helo in it.
> Wazzup?
>  
> Are the docs & Find function in the admin control
panel correctly 
> programmed for Helo?
>  
> BarryZ
>  


Can you give a few examples. It could be:
	1) invalid names which will fail to lookup.
	2) it just isn't waiting long enough for these dns lookups
to come  back.
	3) your dns lookups are failing due to dns fault or load.
	4) something else 

		ChrisP.





Re: X-Verify-Helo
country flaguser name
United States
2007-09-04 00:11:32
The Received-SPF and Received: from lines show the IP and the name. ; Therefore, DNS is not failing.
Comcast, Optonline.net and other major cable providers will block your IP if you attempt to verify their senders on incoming emails... which is one of the reasons&nbsp;why the Friends system is good (it sends an email, not a <>).
and I don't remember if we have Verify All Senders turned on or not... probably... with some of those ISPs on the Exception List.
 
Some of the emails that have been accepted here have the X-Verify-Helo line, ;while others don't.
I'm wondering if the appearance of the X-Verify-Helo is controlled by the user's settings.
Regardless, What does this header do and what should the responses be?
 
98% of residential customers have Friends turned on.  Some business customers have everything turned off - even SPF-Fail.&nbsp; Consequently those business customers are receiving all kinds of junk mail from outside the USA.
I recommend to them all to turn on Friends, but most&nbsp;customers 'don't have a clue' and are not willing to receive phonecalls from first-time senders who receive the Friends Challenge... because the sender says "your server rejected my email" (which is incorrect... teach the ;Moroons how to READ.)&nbsp; This also tells me to re-design the Friends Challenge to say something like "Hello first-time sender.&nbsp; If you want to send me emails, Click Here."&nbsp; -- anything else confuses them.
 
The Surgemail server is doing a great job for those with Friends turned on and SPF turned on, I am just trying to make life less painful for the business clients.
 
Here are some examples as requested:

Received: from conest.com (bbs.conest.com [74.8.70.178])
X-Verify-Helo: conest.com -> 199.231.*.* not in 74.8.70.178

Received: from SBYLIPORT1.US.AD.LFG.COM (e1.lnc.com [170.226.18.105])
X-Verify-Helo: SBYLIPORT1.US.AD.LFG.COM -> LOOKUP_FAILED, wanted
170.226.18.105

Received: from mailer6.kintera.com (mailer6.kintera.com [206.190.70.17])
X-Verify-Helo: mailer6.kintera.com -> 66.179.*.* not in 206.190.70.17

Received: from imo-m11.mail.aol.com (imo-m11.mx.aol.com [64.12.136.170])
X-Verify-Helo: imo-m11.mail.aol.com -> 172.20.*.* not in 64.12.136.170

Received: from mx39.smf.ebay.com (mxsmfpool16.ebay.com [66.135.209.213])
X-Verify-Helo: mx39.smf.ebay.com -> LOOKUP_FAILED, wanted 66.135.209.213

Received: from den01imail01.den.paypal.com (outbound2.den.paypal.com
[216.113.188.112])
X-Verify-Helo: den01imail01.den.paypal.com -> LOOKUP_FAILED, wanted
216.113.188.112

Received: from ALPINEROSE1 (ptelco-dsl026102.pal.ptd.net [204.186.26.102])
X-Verify-Helo: ALPINEROSE1 -> LOOKUP_FAILED, wanted 204.186.26.102

Received: from alnrmhc14.comcast.net (alnrmhc14.comcast.net
[204.127.225.94])
X-Verify-Helo: alnrmhc14.comcast.net -> 206.18.*.* not in 204.127.225.94

Received: from marge (pool-72-81-120-181.phlapa.east.verizon.net
[72.81.120.181])
X-Verify-Helo: marge -> LOOKUP_FAILED, wanted 72.81.120.181
This is a customer using SMTP Authentication

Received: from tromsa001.tarot.com (tromail.69-30-39-242.tarot.com
[69.30.39.242])
X-Verify-Helo: tromsa001.tarot.com -> LOOKUP_FAILED, wanted 69.30.39.242

Received: from maryknoll.org (prod-server2.maryknoll.org [216.187.59.100])
X-Verify-Helo: maryknoll.org -> 66.235.*.* not in 216.187.59.100


BarryZ
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 10:44 PM
Subject: Re: [SurgeMail List] X-Verify-Helo



1usa.com">webmaster1usa.com wrote:
>; Why does the X-Verify-Helo header sometimes/always show Lookup Failed,
> wanted <ip address>;
> I cannot filter on this header if it's not returning correct answers.
&gt; What does this header do and what should the responses be?
> 
> When you goto Find the config setting 'helo', it returns "spam control"
> page.... but there are so many sections on the Spam Control page to look...
&gt; and I cannot find any listings on the Spam Control page with g_helo in it.
> Wazzup?
&gt; 
> Are the docs & Find function in the admin control panel correctly
> programmed for Helo?
> 
> BarryZ
>


Can you give a few examples. It could be:
1) invalid names which will fail to lookup.
2) it just isn't waiting long enough for these dns lookups to come&nbsp; back.
3) your dns lookups are failing due to dns fault or load.
4) something else

ChrisP.




[1-8]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )