List Info

Thread: Re: Re: Gateway Port
Re: Re: Gateway Port
country flaguser name
United States		 2007-10-22 19:45:36 

  


  

    
A few are starting to block 110.  I have had to have an alternate setup
for POP3. ; SBC/AT&;T has started blocking port 110 recently.



Really don't know why though.  Internally AT&T is pushing towards
all email sent/received via ssl for their customers.



Lyle



1usa.com">webmaster1usa.com wrote:

BARRYZ" type="cite">
  
  
  
  
More info:

  
No ISP blocks port 110 that I know of.

  
The alternate SMTP port for 25 is 587

  
Try not to use ports that are used by
viruses.  http://www.simovits.com/trojans/trojans.html

  
 

  
BarryZ

  
 

  
-----
Original Message -----
  
  
  
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 4:59 PM

  
Subject: [SurgeMail List] Re: Gateway Port

  

  


  

Hi,

  

   surgemail-listnetwinsite.com">surgemail-listnetwinsite.com
wrote:

> I am using the g_gateway setting, but I need to gateway thru a
port other than 25.  Is there a way to specify the port to use??

  

Yes, just use the format

ip:port

  

Regards,

Stuart

  

  

-- 

When replying please quote original message to save time and always let

us know what OS and version of SurgeMail you are using.

  

****************************************************************************

If you wish to communicate with other users and talk about SurgeMail and

also get news about updates etc then join the SurgeMail List.

Send an email to  surgemail-list-requestnetwinsite.com">surgemail-list-requestnetwinsite.com
with only 

"subscribe" in the message body

  

FAQ - http://www.netwinsite.com/surgemail/help/faq.htm

****************************************************************************
  

  

  






  

  
  
   
     
    

  

    Re:  Re: Gateway Port
  


  

     country flaguser name
United States		
     2007-10-22 22:49:10
  


  

    
Lyle,

Lyle Giese wrote:
> A few are starting to block 110.  I have had to have an
alternate 
> setup for POP3.  SBC/AT&T has started blocking port
110 recently.
>
> Really don't know why though.  Internally AT&T is
pushing towards all 
> email sent/received via ssl for their customers.
>
> Lyle
Just curious where you found this information. Is it for DSL
customers or..?

Thanks

Dale


> webmaster1usa.com wrote:
>> More info:
>> No ISP blocks port 110 that I know of.
>> The alternate SMTP port for 25 is 587
>> Try not to use ports that are used by viruses.  
>> http://w
ww.simovits.com/trojans/trojans.html
>>  
>> BarryZ
>>  
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> *From SurgeMail
Support <mailto:surgemail-supportnetwinsite.com>
>> *To
surgemail-listnetwinsite.com 
>> <mailto:surgemail-listnetwinsite.com>
>> *Sent Monday,
October 22, 2007 4:59 PM
>> *Subject [SurgeMail
List] Re: Gateway Port
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> surgemail-listnetwinsite.com
<mailto:surgemail-listnetwinsite.com> 
>> wrote:
>> > I am using the g_gateway setting, but I need
to gateway thru a port 
>> other than 25.  Is there a way to specify the port
to use??
>>
>> Yes, just use the format
>> ip:port
>>
>> Regards,
>> Stuart
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> When replying please quote original message to save
time and always let
>> us know what OS and version of SurgeMail you are
using.
>>
>>
************************************************************
****************
>> If you wish to communicate with other users and
talk about SurgeMail and
>> also get news about updates etc then join the
SurgeMail List.
>> Send an email to surgemail-list-requestnetwinsite.com 
>> <mailto:surgemail-list-requestnetwinsite.com> with only
>> "subscribe" in the message body
>>
>> FAQ - http
://www.netwinsite.com/surgemail/help/faq.htm
>>
************************************************************
**************** 
>>
>>
>>
>




  


  

    
  

  
  
   
     
    

  

    Re:  SSL Login Authentications or
Compression    ( was Re: Gateway Port)
  


  

     country flaguser name
United States		
     2007-10-22 23:42:14
  


  

    

  


  

    

>>Internally AT&T is pushing towards all 
email sent/received via ssl for their customers.
Lyle

For years, I have known that there are some spammers who try to 
capture the Logins to your mail servers by using certain *nix 
tools.


For our customers who don't use SSL, I see, categorically, 
they receive more spams than those customers who use SSL.


Also, on another note, many new WebServers serve out web 
pages using Compression.


!! An idea for ChrisP at Netwin would be to investigate 
using Compression in Surgemail when emails are sent/received.  This could 
also be implemented in DBabble initially, then Webmail (because IE7 supports 
compression), then on to Sugemail itself - for emails between&nbsp;other 
Surgemail servers.&nbsp; While it isn't "SSL", it would prevent snooping 99% of 
the time; plus it would be invisible, and it would be a good Marketing 
feature.


and...


While "broadband" is available nationwide here in the USA, 
only 65% of the people live in areas served by a broadband provider, leaving the 
remaining customers (who live outside the broadband areas) to still use Dialup 
connections.


Having Compression in Webmail on a Dialup connection would 
be a great feature! and a great selling point for us to obtain new 
customers.


 


BarryZ


1USA

  

  
  
   
     
    

  

     Surgemail Feature Request
  


  

     country flaguser name
United States		
     2007-10-23 19:18:02
  


  

    

  


  

    

ChrisP


Please consider this feature request.


On the RBL page, the options are Deny, Accept, 
Stamp.&nbsp;  I'd like to have another -- Drop.


Our g_deny list is getting WAY too long. ; It 
needs to be moved into the DNS function.


Purpose:&nbsp; I want to drop connections, not 
reject.


 


g_black_to and g_black_above are OK at 30 
minutes&nbsp;- otherwise it would permanently block Hotmail, Gmail, 
Yahoo.


 


Thanks


BarryZ


1USA


 

  

  
  
   
     
    






 [1-4]











   
 





about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )