surgemail-list netwinsite.com wrote:
> An issue was called to my attention by an angry user of
greater salary than myself. She composed a message to about
a half-dozen recipients. One address had an issue.
Surgemail accepted her message, and appeared to send it, but
it in fact didn't get sent, and didn't write a copy to the
SENT folder either. The bad address caused the message to
be entirely rejected. The logs show a line for each
recipient like:
> 10 15:35:29[551137] Dropped 192.168.6.42 <sender domain.com> <recipient domain.com> 0
"[192.168.6.42] No DATA command sent"
>
> I'm running 3.9c-1. This seems to be a new behavior.
Could you tell me if it's intentional, or hopefully
something that needs fixing?
>
> Thanks
> Ben
Hi,
When you send to an incorrect address, the server sends back
a code
immediately for that bad rcpt (assuming the rcpt is local)
which it is
supposed to do, the client then usually aborts the message.
What is strange is that you are saying surgemail appearted
to accept the
message which would mean maybe the client is doing something
silly and
not picking up the invalid rcpt.
It would be nice to see the whole log section so I can see
what happened
completely just one rcpt doesn't really show enough of
what happened.
What client were you sending with ?
Regards,
Stuart
--
When replying please quote original message to save time and
always let
us know what OS and version of SurgeMail you are using.
************************************************************
****************
If you wish to communicate with other users and talk about
SurgeMail and
also get news about updates etc then join the SurgeMail
List.
Send an email to surgemail-list-request netwinsite.com with only
"subscribe" in the message body
FAQ - http
://www.netwinsite.com/surgemail/help/faq.htm
************************************************************
****************
|