"Now, I know that Challenge-Response is a major
component in Netwin's
anti-spam toolbox"
It is? I've never used it. I use friends, but I don't have
the
challenge/response turned on. I use: "Apply friends
list but don't block
anything or request confirmation."
I also have the option to "Add all outgoing email
addresses to list."
turned on.
This means that I have a nice little white list after a
while. By
setting the Aspam setting for 1+ that pretty stops
everything unless it
is in the friends list.
Warren Michelsen wrote:
> At 7:34 PM -0500 4/21/08, Lyle Giese wrote:
>> Personally I absolutely detest the
Friends/Challenge system. The
>> biggest drawback is that users NEVER check to see
what was blocked. I
>> have exactly three accounts here that have a
Friends/Challenge on
>> them. All the time, I am seeing the Challenge go
out and we get a
>> challenge back. And the other party never checks
their pending list
>> and will never see our challenge.
>>
>
> <Opinion>
> "Friends" challenges are a rude, selfish
thing. It says, "I'm making
> more work for you to save myself
bother.</opinion>
>
> These challenges just add to the clutter that is email
these days.
> While it may make things better for the challenger, it
does so at the
> expense of others.
>
> Now, I know that Challenge-Response is a major
component in Netwin's
> anti-spam toolbox and philosophy and that some on this
list embrace it
> unreservedly, but I, as my server's admin, would prefer
a way to turn
> it off globally so that users are not offered the
ability to turn on
> Challenge-Response at all.
>
> I have received challenges from mailing lists,
including this one, and
> I have received a challenge in response to an off-list
message to a
> poster who needed help. I never, ever, respond to these
challenges; I
> don't want to encourage bad behavior. It used to be
that the rudeness
> factor was my only objection but the
backscatter/clutter problem is
> increasingly a concern.
>
>
>
>
|