|
List Info
Thread: Re: Re Re: ISO
|
|
| Re: Re Re: ISO |
 
Romania |
2008-03-26 11:26:19 |
|
Yes, Cydne, I am that guy, and if you think that was the reason for my post
you are wrong...
But this post and some other convinced me that is time to say goodbye.
You are right, no more Nikon user, no sense to continue to read here.
Bye
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cydne" < chinamartine%40charter.net">chinamartine charter.net>
To: < Nikon-D70%40yahoogroups.com">Nikon-D70yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 17:54
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [Nikon-D70] Re: ISO
> Renato, aren't you the guy who's Nikon was lost by UPS (or the local
> equivalent) some time ago and because neither that company nor Nikon
> would replace it, you switched brands, although staying on this
>; list? Or am I mis-rembering and that was someone else? If so, I do
> apologize. But it seems that you've kinda' been on Nikon's case for
> quite some time now. And that person was certainly unhappy with
>; Nikon for not replacing something they said never reached them.
> Again, if I'm wrong, I do abjectly apologize.
>
> Cydne
>
>
> On Mar 26, 2008, at 6:58 AM, Renato Aranghelovici wrote:
>
>>> Otherwise your comments sound like an unsupported rant and I am
>>> sure you
>>> are more capable than that.
>>
>> What can I say other than no less than 3 fellows from my small local
>> community sold their d300 after less than one month of evaluation and
>> switched 2 of them to second hand D2X and one to other brand?
>>
>> Are you feeling better if the camera that perform not so good in
>> your hands
>> has raving reviews? Do you believe all reviews?
>> Personaly I advice anyone who want to buy a D300 to not buy without
>> test it
>> first, or having return choice.
>> And don't forget early adopters surprises, like D70 BGLOD...
>
>;
>
__._,_.___
.
__,_._,___
|
| Re: ISO |
 
United States |
2008-03-26 16:10:00 |
|
--- In Nikon-D70%40yahoogroups.com">Nikon-D70yahoogroups.com, "Renato Aranghelovici"
<renato.aranghelovici...> wrote:
>
> Yes, Cydne, I am that guy, and if you think that was the reason for my
> post you are wrong...
>
> But this post and some other convinced me that is time to say goodbye.
> You are right, no more Nikon user, no sense to continue to read here.
>
> Bye
Your contributions will be missed.
__._,_.___
.
__,_._,___
|
| RE: Re Re: ISO |
|
2008-03-26 20:13:00 |
|
What did I just miss? I've just been lurking because of work and because my
wife and I just gave birth to a baby girl in December so I've not been
reading every post.
Now I see this? Dude, don't go. when I have had time to read I've noticed
you're one of the few that try to help and such. you will be missed
regardless of what system you're using. I know this group was intended as a
Nikon D70 group but the information we've shared regarding photography in
general has been a great help even if I don't comment or add to anything
lately.
_____
From: Nikon-D70%40yahoogroups.com">Nikon-D70yahoogroups.com [mailto: Nikon-D70%40yahoogroups.com">Nikon-D70yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Renato Aranghelovici
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 9:26 AM
To: Nikon-D70%40yahoogroups.com">Nikon-D70yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [Nikon-D70] Re: ISO
Yes, Cydne, I am that guy, and if you think that was the reason for my post
you are wrong...
But this post and some other convinced me that is time to say goodbye.
You are right, no more Nikon user, no sense to continue to read here.
Bye
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cydne" <chinamartine <mailto:chinamartine%40charter.net>
charter.net>
To: <Nikon-D70yahoogrou <mailto:Nikon-D70%40yahoogroups.com>; ps.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 17:54
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [Nikon-D70] Re: ISO
> Renato, aren't you the guy who's Nikon was lost by UPS (or the local
> equivalent) some time ago and because neither that company nor Nikon
> would replace it, you switched brands, although staying on this
>; list? Or am I mis-rembering and that was someone else? If so, I do
> apologize. But it seems that you've kinda' been on Nikon's case for
> quite some time now. And that person was certainly unhappy with
>; Nikon for not replacing something they said never reached them.
> Again, if I'm wrong, I do abjectly apologize.
>
> Cydne
>
>
> On Mar 26, 2008, at 6:58 AM, Renato Aranghelovici wrote:
>
>>> Otherwise your comments sound like an unsupported rant and I am
>>> sure you
>>> are more capable than that.
>>
>> What can I say other than no less than 3 fellows from my small local
>> community sold their d300 after less than one month of evaluation and
>> switched 2 of them to second hand D2X and one to other brand?
>>
>> Are you feeling better if the camera that perform not so good in
>> your hands
>> has raving reviews? Do you believe all reviews?
>> Personaly I advice anyone who want to buy a D300 to not buy without
>> test it
>> first, or having return choice.
>> And don't forget early adopters surprises, like D70 BGLOD...
>
>;
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
__._,_.___
.
__,_._,___
|
[1-3]
|
|