I wouldn't give up the 80-400 for the 18-200.
I would leave the 80-400 at home though. The 18-70 is enough for me on
digital, and where I'd have issues is on the wide end anyways (I'd be
carrying a 12-24 or Sigma 10-20 instead of the 80-400)
-Adam
Chris Stanford wrote:
> OK. One last try. Let me rephrase the question again.
>
> Does anyone really need the extra 200mm? Can one (anyone) live with
> one 10X-plus lens?
>
> --- In NikonLenses%40yahoogroups.com">NikonLenses
yahoogroups.com, Cydne <chinamartine
...> wrote:
>> That is a question that only you could answer.
>>
>> Cydne
>>
>>
>> On Apr 2, 2007, at 3:48 AM, Chris Stanford wrote:
>>
>>> I guess my question would have been better posed (and it is quite
>>> rhetorical), do I really need the extra 200mm? Can I live with one
>>> 10X-plus lens?
>>>
>>> This is the debate I was seeking to entice.
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
.