Re: Re: Which 2 lenses to start with

sevignyj <sevignyjyahoo.com> wrote:

When I got my first Nikon DSLR I immediately picked up a used 17-35,
which is more of a normal lens than a wide once you consider the crop
factor.

http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/1735.htm

I also got an older 70-200 2.8 for like $600 used.

It's a very good combination but I now find myself longing for
something smaller and prime, like a 20mm.

gonecity.blogspot.com

--- In NikonLenses%40yahoogroups.com">NikonLensesyahoogroups.com, JDF <blahoovanous...> wrote:
&gt;
> I have a 28mm f/1.8 and a 50mm f/1.8 that I use a lot. They are
very nice lenses and being prime lenses they have fewer issues than
zooms. And I'll keep saying it, the 50mm f/1.8 is dirt cheap and a
high-performance lens.
&gt;
>
> sevignyj <sevignyj...> wrote:
&gt; When I got my first Nikon DSLR I immediately picked up a
used 17-35,
> which is more of a normal lens than a wide once you consider the
crop
> factor.
>
> http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/1735.htm
>
> I also got an older 70-200 2.8 for like $600 used.
&gt;
> It's a very good combination but I now find myself longing for
> something smaller and prime, like a 20mm.
>
> gonecity.blogspot.com
>
>
> hello... when i bought my first dslr it was already packaged with
a kit lens 18-70mm, then afterwards i bought a 70 -300mm my kit lens
ends with 70mm and my zoom lens starts at 70mm.
best regards.

-tedt
> please visit some of my images at
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rundstedt/ comments and suggestions are
highly appreciated. thank you very much.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
&gt; Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.
&gt;