Re: Re: Canon 500D (was 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6D)

Agreed,
though I tend to carry a tube or two with me all the time, as the 135
f2 really makes a heck of a nice full frame portrait lens with a PK13
(on either film or the S2).

erie

Bob Reimer wrote:
> Brand new at B&H or Adorama for 139.95 for the 77mm version ... much cheaper
> than any of the Nikkor Micros. If it went for more than that, then people
> aren't doing their homework. Admittedly tubes are cheaper but having the
> diopter in the pocket to screw on the front gets me what I need and avoids
> dust-inducing lens removals especially when I am using the camera in the
> desert.
>
> Warm regards,
> Bob Reimer
> Al Ain
> United Arab Emirates
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/rwreimer
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NikonLenses%40yahoogroups.com">NikonLensesyahoogroups.com [mailto: NikonLenses%40yahoogroups.com">NikonLensesyahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Erie Patsellis
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 8:09 AM
> To: NikonLenses%40yahoogroups.com">NikonLensesyahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [NikonLenses] Re: 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6D
>
> Chris Stanford wrote:
>

Messages in this topic (16) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic

.