Hi All
I've been reading posts on lenses with interest for some time, particularly on the 80-400VR and teleconverters. I'm an enthusiast with a bit too much money to spend it seems. I have a 12-24, 24-120VR, 80-200 f2.8 and 70-300ED for use on a D100 and D200. My dilema stems from the fact that I cannot get results as good as I would expect from the 80-200. I purchased this lens expecting an improvement in sharpness over my existing lesnes.
I first noticed soft images when compared to the 70-300 and testing showed that it was back focussing ( focussing on a point beyont that expected) at all focus distances. It could be focussed manually but even then it did not exceed the results from the 70-300.
I sent the lens and the D200 in for evaluation/repair. The Nikon service agent here in Melbourne, Australia said that there as nothing wrong with the len
s but they
adjusted my camera to compensate. The lens now seems to focus OK at longer focal lengths but still back focusses at closer distances (2 to 3 metres).
The images I get are still no better than those from the 70-300.
Questions
1. Is there a possibility that my technique is the reason for no improvement in the 80-200 over the 70-300.
2. Should the 80-200 perform better than the 70-300.
3. Should I take it back to the service agent and insist that they get it right.
4. Should I cut my losses and consider another lens.
In July, my wife and I are taking a trip to Canada and Alaska a considerable journey from here in Australia. I want to be sure I can make the most of the photographic opportunities that present themselves. I'm concerned at the softness
in my images at longer focal lengths I'm getting aqt the moment.
Any advice/suggestions on these issues are most welcome
Jim Legg
Melbourne
Australia.
Get the name you always wanted with the new y7mail email address.
.