-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog merit.edu] On Behalf Of
Niels Bakker
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 3:31 PM
To: nanog merit.edu
Subject: Re: Curious question on hop identity...
* JJackson aninetworks.com (Joseph Jackson) [Fri 15 Dec 2006,
00:11
CET]:
>I'm pretty new to the networking world. While I don't
run a huge and
>complex network in a service provider market. We're just
an enterprise
>network. I have read a lot of useful info about
networking from the
>nanog list. But I do have to say that when I speak to
the designers and
>such at larger companies and I mention NANOG most of
them brush it off
>and say "The NANOG people are the past and what
they have to say
doesn't
>matter anymore".
>That's the general feel I get from others when it
concerns NANOG.
Sounds like a strong and well-made argument. Instead of
coming up with
responses to individual points your detractors are making,
wipe them off
the table in one fell swoop by declaring its proponents out
of touch.
I wish I was unscrupulous enough to get away with it too...
-- Niels.
I didn't say I listened to them.
|