List Info

Thread: Curious question on hop identity...




Curious question on hop identity...
user name
2006-12-15 07:12:56


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanogmerit.edu [mailto:owner-nanogmerit.edu] On Behalf Of
Niels Bakker
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 3:31 PM
To: nanogmerit.edu
Subject: Re: Curious question on hop identity...


* JJacksonaninetworks.com (Joseph Jackson) [Fri 15 Dec 2006,
00:11
CET]:
>I'm pretty new to the networking world.  While I don't
run a huge and 
>complex network in a service provider market. We're just
an enterprise 
>network.  I have read a lot of useful info about
networking from the 
>nanog list. But I do have to say that when I speak to
the designers and

>such at larger companies and I mention NANOG most of
them brush it off 
>and say "The NANOG people are the past and what
they have to say
doesn't 
>matter anymore".
>That's the general feel I get from others when it
concerns NANOG.

Sounds like a strong and well-made argument.  Instead of
coming up with 
responses to individual points your detractors are making,
wipe them off

the table in one fell swoop by declaring its proponents out
of touch.

I wish I was unscrupulous enough to get away with it too...


	-- Niels.


I didn't say I listened to them.
[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )