RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted

On Tue, 29 May 2007 michael.dillonbt.com wrote:

>
>
> > > > For core links it should IMHO be mostly
possible to keep them
> > > > IPv4/IPv6
> > > > dual-stack.
> > >
> > > What's wrong with MPLS in the core and 6PE at
the edge?
> > >
> > > Right there you have two possible tactics
that are worthy of being
> > > publicly discussed and compared.
> >
> > stewart bamford gave a good presentation about
this very
> > thing 4 nanogs ago (or maybe 5)> There are some
support
> > issues to keep in mind of course.
>
> Perhaps it was this one?
> http://
www.nanog.org/mtg-0510/pdf/bamford.pdf

indeed, thanks!

>
> Note that Level3 did choose to use 6PE for their
deployment rather than
> dual-stacking.
>

I think he stated that initial deployment was 6pe, but they
had planned to
re-deploy native v6 at a later date.