> > I understand the problems but I think there are
clear cut cases where
> > /48's make sense- a large scale anycast DNS
provider would seem to be a
> > good candidate for a /48 and I would hope it would
get routed. Then
> > again that might be the only sensible reason...
>
> f-root does this on the IPv6 side: 2001:500::/48
>
> Whether that's available everywhere on IPv6 networks,
is as Bill
> pointed-out, another question.
<http://www.arin.net/reference/micro_allocations.html>
explains what's going
on with that /48. <http://www.root-serv
ers.org/> shows some other /48's. if
the RIR community wants "critical infrastructure"
to use a /48, then f-root's
operator will comply. if the RIR community changes its
mind, then f-root's
operator will comply with that, too.
--
Paul Vixie
|
