List Info

Thread: Re: IPv6 Deployment (Was: Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted)




Re: IPv6 Deployment (Was: Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted)
country flaguser name
United States
2007-05-30 09:12:54
> But now PI is there, no more restrictions in the path,
so they can use
> "traditional" multihoming 
If ARIN is going to assign /48's, and people are blocking
anything longer 
than /32- well then that's a problem 

-Don

Re: IPv6 Deployment (Was: Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted)
country flaguser name
United States
2007-05-30 09:41:16
Donald Stahl wrote:
> 
> If ARIN is going to assign /48's, and people are
blocking anything 
> longer than /32- well then that's a problem 

To be specific, ARIN is currently assigning up to /48 out
of
2620::/23.

I noticed that htt
p://www.space.net/~gert/RIPE/ipv6-filters.html
has the following entry in the "strict" list:

ipv6 prefix-list ipv6-ebgp-strict permit 2620::/23 ge 24 le
32

which is not particularly useful. It should be 'le 48' if
the
intent is to track RIR assignment policies.

- Kevin

[1-2]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )