-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- -- Per Heldal <heldal eml.cc> wrote:
>Regulation targeting software-vendors and
service-providers has little
>effect as it is an attempt to disrupt the money-flow
somewhere in the
>middle. It's usually more efficient to
"attack" the source. I.e.
>authorities must hold computer users responsible and
make them pay every
>penny (or millions;) it costs to investigate and clean
up their mess.
>Mainstream OS'es as we know them would have been
unsellable in today's
>market if users, ever since the internet was
commercialised, had been
>held responsible.
>
When the banks & merchants get sick & tired of
underwriting the
fraud investigation and coverage liabilities, I think we
will
begin to see more of an effort to put more of the liability
in the
user's lap.
In fact, I think we are already starting to see some
movement
in the fringes regarding this.
The only thing I can say about this is: be careful what you
ask for.
The issues that might result as fall-out might be uglier
than what
we have now. :-/
- - ferg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.1 (Build 1012)
wj8DBQFGcxuCq1pz9mNUZTMRAqmVAJwPwjgyLxKzlNqwbRZgXUk2uD4aywCd
H+CQ
MQJd8B/HGuhDFhCSN4K0K0M=
=3NdK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
fergdawg(at)netzero.net
ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspo
t.com/
|