Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again...

On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 11:52:11 -0500 (EST)
Sean Donelan <seandonelan.com> wrote:

> I just wish the IETF would acknowledge this and go
ahead and define a
> DNS bit for artificial DNS answers for all these
"address correction" and 
> "domain parking" and "domain
tasting" people to use for their keen
> "Web 2.0" ideas.

Yes, let's let the IETF go off for 7 years to debate and try
to put
into an RFC something else that won't actually be used. 
Sorry Sean,
you've lost me on this one.  

John

In article <200711051726.lA5HQpft019903larry.centergate.com> you write:
>
>On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 11:52:11 -0500 (EST)
>Sean Donelan <seandonelan.com> wrote:
>
>> I just wish the IETF would acknowledge this and go
ahead and define a
>> DNS bit for artificial DNS answers for all these
"address correction" and 
>> "domain parking" and "domain
tasting" people to use for their keen
>> "Web 2.0" ideas.
>
>Yes, let's let the IETF go off for 7 years to debate and
try to put
>into an RFC something else that won't actually be used. 
Sorry Sean,
>you've lost me on this one.  
>
>John

	You already have the bits for SE (and other signed
	infrastructure zones) that allow you to detect when this
	sort of garbage is pulled.  All you have to do is deploy
	a DNSSEC aware resolver.

	Mark