hijack chronology: was

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Greetings,

Late last night, after poring through our data, I posted a
detailed 
chronology of the hijack as seen from our many peering
sessions.  I 
would add to this that the speed of YouTube's response to
this 
subprefix hijack impressed me.

As discussed earlier in this thread, this is really the same
old 
song--it simply has a new verse now.  (How many of our
troubadors 
know all of the verses since AS 7007?)

Best,

- -Martin

 [0] http://www.renesys.com/blog/2008/02/pakistan_h
ijacks_youtube.shtml

- -- 
Martin A. Brown --- Renesys Corporation --- mabrownrenesys.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: pgf-0.72 (http://linux-
ip.net/sw/pine-gpg-filter/)

iD8DBQFHwtYodXQGngQsWbkRAv1PAKDB0w1OjRmKjF7027ccZJzuzyboKQCg
wxFt
V8CNr0Nzw2lqx0O5vk3uHKo=
=GUic
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Martin A Brown writes:
> Late last night, after poring through our data, I
posted a detailed
> chronology of the hijack as seen from our many peering
sessions.  I
> would add to this that the speed of YouTube's response
to this
> subprefix hijack impressed me.

For a Sunday afternoon, yes, not bad.

Here's a graphical version of the timeline:

http://www.ris.ripe.net/cgi-bin/bgplay.cgi?prefix=208.6
5.153.0/24&start=2008-02-24+18:46&end=2008-02-24+21:
05

> As discussed earlier in this thread, this is really the
same old
> song--it simply has a new verse now.  (How many of our
troubadors
> know all of the verses since AS 7007?)

Probably someone is busy working on the new NANOG song with
an
extending refrain ("AS7007, ..., AS17557, when will we
ever learn?").
-- 
Simon.