List Info

Thread: Re: IPV4 as a Commodity for Profit




Re: IPV4 as a Commodity for Profit
country flaguser name
United States
2008-02-28 10:01:10
Thus spake "Owen DeLong" <owendelong.com>
> On Feb 24, 2008, at 12:45 PM, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
>> The wording of the question and response referred
only to "ARIN 
>> members". That does not include most orgs with
_only_ legacy 
>> allocations, but it would include orgs with both
legacy and non- legacy 
>> allocations.  Presumably, if an org had both types,
both  would have been 
>> included, but that wasn't explicitly stated since
it  wasn't relevant to 
>> the questions I was asking at the time.
>>
> Not necessarily.  Orgs which are end-users and not
LIR/ISP subscriber 
> members may have resources from ARIN without being
members.

82% (by number) of all direct assignments are legacy*, and
that includes all 
of the class A blocks.

While I haven't requested the data to back it up, I find it
fairly obvious 
that non-legacy direct assignments would be smaller on
average and thus 
constitute far less than 18% (by size) of all assignments --
and a trivial 
amount of space overall compared to allocations to
LIRs/ISPs.

S

* Same source.

Stephen Sprunk         "God does not play dice." 
--Albert Einstein
CCIE #3723         "God is an inveterate gambler, and
He throws the
K5SSS        dice at every possible opportunity."
--Stephen Hawking 


[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )