|
List Info
Thread: rack power question
|
|
| rack power question |
  United States |
2008-03-22 21:02:49 |
Hopefully this classifies as on-topic...
I am discussing with some investors the possible setup of
new datacenter
space.
Obviously we want to be able to fill a rack, and in order to
do so, we
need to provide enough power to each rack.
Right now we are in spreadsheet mode evaluating different
scenarios.
Are there cases where more than 6000W per rack would be
needed?
(We are not worried about cooling due to the special
circumstances of
the space.)
Would someone pay extra for > 7KW in a rack? What would
be the maximum
you could ever see yourself needing in order to power all
42U ?
Cordially
Patrick Giagnocavo
patrick zill.net
|
|
| RE: rack power question |
  United States |
2008-03-22 21:32:05 |
> Obviously we want to be able to fill a rack, and in
order to do so, we
> need to provide enough power to each rack.
Which is the hardest part of designing and running a
datacenter.
> Are there cases where more than 6000W per rack would be
needed?
Yes. We are seeing 10kw rack, and requests for 15 to 20kw
are starting
to come in. Think blade.
> (We are not worried about cooling due to the special
circumstances of
> the space.)
You've already lost.
> Would someone pay extra for > 7KW in a rack? What
would be the
maximum
> you could ever see yourself needing in order to power
all 42U ?
These days, there is not (or should not) be a connection
between rack
pricing and what you charge for power.
As for how much, ask HP or IBM or whoever how many blades
they can shove
in 42U.
|
|
| Re: rack power question |
  United States |
2008-03-22 21:34:11 |
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 22:02:49 EDT, Patrick Giagnocavo said:
> Obviously we want to be able to fill a rack, and in
order to do so, we
> need to provide enough power to each rack.
>
> Right now we are in spreadsheet mode evaluating
different scenarios.
>
> Are there cases where more than 6000W per rack would be
needed?
>
> (We are not worried about cooling due to the special
circumstances of
> the space.)
Ooh. Please share. You're the first case I've seen in a
*long* time where
getting the BTU's *out* of the rack wasn't more of a
challenge than getting
the watts *into* the rack. Once you're talking about
"datacenter" sized
spaces, those BTU's add up, and there's plenty of current
spaces where the
limit isn't the power feed into the building, it's the room
on the roof for
the chillers....
|
|
| Re: rack power question |

|
2008-03-22 21:54:15 |
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008, Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
> Would someone pay extra for > 7KW in a rack? What
would be the maximum you
> could ever see yourself needing in order to power all
42U ?
As you recognize, its not an engineering question; its an
economic
question. Notice how Google's space/power philosphy changed
between
leveraging other people's space/power, and now that they own
their own
space/power.
Existing equipment could exceed 20kW in a rack, and some
folks are
planning for equipment exceeding 30kW in a rack.
But things get more interesting when you look at the total
economics
of a data center. 8kW/rack is the new "average,"
but that includes
a lot of assumptions. If someone else is paying, I want it
and more.
If I'm paying for it, I discover I can get by with less.
|
|
| Re: rack power question |
  United States |
2008-03-22 22:19:14 |
PG> Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 22:02:49 -0400
PG> From: Patrick Giagnocavo
PG> Hopefully this classifies as on-topic...
PG>
PG> I am discussing with some investors the possible
setup of new
PG> datacenter space.
You might also try the isp-colo.com list.
PG> Are there cases where more than 6000W per rack would
be needed?
It depends how one differentiates between "want"
and "need".
PG> (We are not worried about cooling due to the special
circumstances
PG> of the space.)
ixp.aq?
PG> Would someone pay extra for > 7KW in a rack?
They should. If they need more than 6kW, their alternative
is to pay
for a second rack, which hardly would be free.
PG> What would be the maximum you could ever see yourself
needing in
PG> order to power all 42U ?
1. For colo, think 1U dual-core servers with 3-4 HDD;
2. For routers, Google: juniper t640 kw.
HTH,
Eddy
--
Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
a>
A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network
building
Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita
____________________________________________________________
____________
DO NOT send mail to the following addresses:
davidc brics.com -*- jfconmaapaq intc.net -*- sam everquick.net
Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get
blocked.
Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software
backscatter.
|
|
| Re: rack power question |
  United States |
2008-03-22 22:50:07 |
At 10:02 PM -0400 3/22/08, Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
>Hopefully this classifies as on-topic...
>
>I am discussing with some investors the possible setup
of new datacenter space.
>
>Obviously we want to be able to fill a rack, and in
order to do so, we need to provide enough power to each
rack.
>
>Right now we are in spreadsheet mode evaluating
different scenarios.
>
>Are there cases where more than 6000W per rack would be
needed?
10K per rack | ~ 400 watts/sqft is a common design point
being used
by the large scale colocation/reit players. It's quite
possible to exceed
with blade servers or high-density storage (Hitachi, EMC,
etc) but it'd
take unusual business models today to exceed that on every
rack.
>(We are not worried about cooling due to the special
circumstances of the space.)
So, even presuming an abundance of cold air right outside
the facility,
you are still going to move the equipment generated heat to
chillers
or cooling towers. It is quite likely that your HVAC plant
will could be
your effective limit in ability to add power drops.
>Would someone pay extra for > 7KW in a rack? What
would be the maximum you could ever see yourself needing in
order to power all 42U ?
Again, you can find single rack, 30" deep storage
arrays/controllers
that will exceed 20KW, but the hope is that you've got a
cabinet or
two of less dense equipment surrounding them. Best thing to
do is
fine someone in the particular market segment you're aiming
for and
ask them for some averages and trends, since it's going to
vary widely
depending on webhosting/enterprise data center/content
behemoth.
/John
|
|
| Re: rack power question |
  United States |
2008-03-22 23:17:26 |
This greatly depends on what you want to do with the space.
If you're
putting in co-lo space by the square footage footprint then
your
requirements will be much less. If you expect a large
percentage of it
to be leased out to an enterprise then you should expect the
customers
to use every last U in a cabinet before leasing the next
cabinet in the
row. Ie your power usage will be immense.
I did something similar about 2 years ago. We were moving a
customer
from one facility to another. We mapped out each cabinet
including
server models. I looked up maximum power consumption for
each model
including startup consumption. The heaviest loaded cabinet
specced out
at 12,000w. The cabinet was full of old 1U servers. New 1U
servers are
the worst-case scenario by far. 12k is rather low IMHO.
Some industry
analysts estimate that the power requirements for
high-density
applications scale as high as 40kw.
http://www.servertechblog.com/pages/2007/01/cabi
net_level_p.html
There are a few things to remember. Code only permits you
to load a
circuit to 80% of its maximum-rated capacity. The remaining
20% is the
safety margin required by the NEC. Knowing this that means
that the
12Kw specified above require 7x 20a 120v circuits or 5x 30a
120v circuits.
You can get 20a and 30a horizontal PDUs for both 120v and
240v. There
are also 208v options. You can also get up to 40a vertical
PDUs. One
word of caution about the vertical PDUs. If your cabinets
aren't deep
enough in the rear (think J Lo) the power cabling will get
in the way of
the rails and other server cabling. There are others but
they are less
common.
Also remember that many of the larger servers (such as the
Dell 6850s or
6950s) are 240v and will require a pair of dedicated
circuits (20a or 30a).
I would also recommend that you look into in-row power
distribution
cabinets like the Liebert FDC. This means shorter home-runs
for the
large number of circuits you'll be putting in (saving your a
bundle in
copper too). It also means less under-floor wiring to work
around,
making future changes much easier. Changes in distribution
cabinets are
also much easier, safer and less prone to accidents/mistakes
than they
are in distribution panels.
Grounding is a topic that is worthy of its own book.
Consult an
electrician used to working with data centers. Don't
overlook this
critical thing. Standby power sources fall into this topic
as well.
How many 3-phase generators are you going to need to keep
your UPSs hot?
I'm curious what your cooling plans are. I would encourage
you to
consider geothermal cooling though. The efficiencies that
geothermal
brings to the table are worth you time to investigate.
Best of luck,
Justin
Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
>
> Hopefully this classifies as on-topic...
>
> I am discussing with some investors the possible setup
of new datacenter
> space.
>
> Obviously we want to be able to fill a rack, and in
order to do so, we
> need to provide enough power to each rack.
>
> Right now we are in spreadsheet mode evaluating
different scenarios.
>
> Are there cases where more than 6000W per rack would be
needed?
>
> (We are not worried about cooling due to the special
circumstances of
> the space.)
>
> Would someone pay extra for > 7KW in a rack? What
would be the maximum
> you could ever see yourself needing in order to power
all 42U ?
>
> Cordially
>
> Patrick Giagnocavo
> patrick zill.net
>
>
|
|
| RE: rack power question |
  United States |
2008-03-23 00:34:41 |
|
|
What is the purpose of the datacenter computing, datacom/telco or both. AC or DC power feeds or both, backup power or naked, dual feed from the power company with transfer switch or power with generator backup? Are you dual feeding the racks? Do you require NEBs compliant racks to make it through a shake and bake ( a seismic event).
Many centers run DC 50 volt multi hundred amp battery and inverter systems. For AC the higher voltage, three phase is more efficient 220, 440 60 cycle. Power delivery can be at 10 - 12k volts with stepdown transformers in the facility. If the building feed is for the entire facility than you need home runs from the main power panels to your power backup and protection circuits.
When I worked for a certain large fiber backbone based provider of circuits and colo for each amount of rack space and racks you would get so much DC and AC power and to get more you would pay extra. All of the colo power had multi hour battery backup and a generator would kick in. They had a DC distribution plant with AC inverters.
Your largest issue may be grounding and the ground plan for the building and your datacenter in the building. If the building does not have a good ground plane and most do not, you may have to retrofit new grounding pads by digging outside the building or through the floor. You need to measure the potential to determine if their are any ground loops in the building i.e. you want the ground to be the same for all parts of the building. You need to put power and transient monitoring equipment on your power sources to verify no power spikes or large EMI coming into the building. No carpet in the room or you can have bad ESD blowing your equipment. Ground the cabinets and have grounding straps for anyone working on the equipment.
Check power conditioning equipment for being able to handle brownout conditions as well as actual power outages.
In certain areas of the country lightening protection may have to be enhanced for the building. Without adequate high voltage and current shunts and filters your equipment can be wiped out on a regular basis.
You want to locate the datacenter below ground but not in the basement. You want it in the interior of the building for better lightening and storm protection. You do not want it in a hundred year flood plane. or you may need to seal it against incoming water. You do not want to locate it near or below building plumbing. You will want to have non reversible drains to drain water but not backup and flood the facility. You do not want to locate it close to the elevators, building HVAC or other sources of large EM spikes. You may want to add EMI shielding for the room to reduce either EMI leaving or entering the room.
If the power requirements are large enough you will need to use a chiller system to adequately cool the room. This is putting water in your datacenter which is also not a good idea.
During power outages you need to continue to power the HVAC and building control or your facility can go down.
You will need to review structural plans for the building to see if the floors can handle the extra load or if the floors need to be re-enforced.
For security you want re-enforced concrete walls and floors for the room. If the current floors and walls are inadequate you may need to build a room within the room. If the walls are standard concrete block and steel you can run re-enforcing rods and concrete into the blocks. You want steel doors with magnetic locks, that can withstand sledge hammers and people driving into them. Add video surveillance, biometric readers and other sensors for your security systems.
Before you can do any construction of course you will need to get the appropriate city and county permits and permission from the building owners.
If you engineer the facility correctly it can take significant investment for a 5, 10 or 15 year investment period.
IMHO make sure you really want to do this.
Good luck
John (ISDN) Lee
From: owner-nanog merit.edu on behalf of Patrick Giagnocavo Sent: Sat 3/22/2008 10:02 PM To: nanog nanog.org Subject: rack power question
Hopefully this classifies as on-topic...
I am discussing with some investors the possible setup of new datacenter space.
Obviously we want to be able to fill a rack, and in order to do so, we need to provide enough power to each rack.
Right now we are in spreadsheet mode evaluating different scenarios.
Are there cases where more than 6000W per rack would be needed?
(We are not worried about cooling due to the special circumstances of the space.)
Would someone pay extra for > 7KW in a rack? What would be the maximum you could ever see yourself needing in order to power all 42U ?
Cordially
Patrick Giagnocavo patrick zill.net
|
| Re: rack power question |

|
2008-03-23 01:56:57 |
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008, Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
> I am discussing with some investors the possible setup
of new datacenter
> space.
>
> Obviously we want to be able to fill a rack, and in
order to do so, we need
> to provide enough power to each rack.
>
> Right now we are in spreadsheet mode evaluating
different scenarios.
>
> Are there cases where more than 6000W per rack would be
needed?
Is this just for servers, or could there be network gear in
the racks as
well? We normally deploy our 6509s with 6000W AC power
supplies these
days and and I do have some that can draw close to or over
3000W on a
continuous basis. A fully populated 6513 with power hungry
blades
could eat 6000W.
It's been awhile since I've tumbled the numbers, but I think
a 42U rack
full of 1U servers or blade servers could chew through 6000W
and still be
hungry. Are you also taking into account a worst-case
situation, i.e.
everything in the rack powering on at the same time, such as
after a
power outage?
> (We are not worried about cooling due to the special
circumstances of the
> space.)
>
> Would someone pay extra for > 7KW in a rack? What
would be the maximum you
> could ever see yourself needing in order to power all
42U ?
I don't know what you mean by 'extra', but I'd imagine that
if someone
needs 7KW or more in a rack, then they'd be prepared to pay
for the amount
of juice they use. This also means deploying a
metering/monitoring
solution so you can track how much juice your colo customers
use and bill
them accordingly.
Power consumption, both direct (by the equipment itself) and
indirect
(cooling required to dissipate the heat generated by said
equipment) is a
big issue in data center environments these days. Cooling
might not be an
issue in your setup, but it is a big headache for most large
enterprise/data center operators.
jms
|
|
| Re: rack power question |
  United States |
2008-03-23 09:29:12 |
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
> and and I do have some that can draw close to or over
3000W on a continuous
> basis. A fully populated 6513 with power hungry blades
could eat 6000W.
Easily. The HP blades I have right now are 14 servers in
10u, 6-7,000W.
Breaker on it needs to be for over 10,000W. (30x208x1.73 for
30A 3 phase)
With our 1u servers, we're able to get about 12 or so in a
rack with a 20A
208V single phase (my exact budget numbers are behind a vpn
I don't feel
like firing up...;) plus a pair of switches.
At 370W (peak), i'd need 15540W to power 42 of them, 27,972W
at the
breaker (I prefer 75 to 80% of breakered capacity vs the
NEC's 85%).
Works out to something like 4 30A 208v single phase circuits
and 1 20A.
So 29120W at the breaker.
That's a lot of hot air. ;)
...david
---
david raistrick http:
//www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
drais icantclick.org http://www.expita.c
om/nomime.html
|
|
|
|