List Info

Thread: minimizing BGP link failure detection time




minimizing BGP link failure detection time
country flaguser name
Singapore
2008-03-30 09:54:54
Hi all,

I'm currently getting started out with BGP so if I'm asking
the obvious, 
please forgive my ignorance.

On the topic of BGP convergence, may I ask what are the
current best 
practices for ensuring rapid link failure detection -
especially when 
dealing with an interface that is connected to 3rd party L2

infrastructure? e.g. an interface connected to an EBGP peer
via Metro-E

As far as I'm aware, the most commonly used method to
minimize link 
failure detection time is to tune the keepalive/hold timers.
I 
understand that there are alternatives to this such as BFD
and next hop 
tracking - but support for this is limited on certain
platforms.

I have looked through this presentation from APNIC 21.
http://www.apnic.net/meetings/21/d
ocs/sigs/routing/routing-pres-hughes-bgp.pdf

What do you guys think of the recommendation for timers? (5s
and 15s for 
keepalive and hold timers respectively). However, since the
presentation 
is more than a year old, has BFD become a better solution to
this?

Looking forward to your suggestions.

Thanks
--
ANG Kah Yik (bangky)


[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )