On 3/23/07, Tom Schindl <listom bestsolution.at> wrote:
>
> Soul Stealer schrieb:
> > Hello list
> > I'm applying in GSoC for the odftoolkit project
> > I was looking at the CVS repo for the odftoolkit
in odf4j
> > I'd like to help in odf4j.
> > I noticed that you use the SAX parser, which is
good, but can I suggest
> the
> > StAX parsing API ?
> > Since it has some advantages over SAX for example
if we have very large
> ODF
> > document and we wish to convert it to text and our
application is
> somehow
> > busy or our machine is slow also the ODF document
might be at some
> remote
> > host. In such cases might be better to use pull
parsing like StAX so the
> > application can pull an infoset whet it's ready.
This could bring better
> > performance.
> > Also I got an idea, I don't know how much useful
it'll be but I think
> that
> > it's cool if the application can convert ODF
documents to suitable
> format
> > for storing in a database.
> > Image we have many similar ODF documents and we
wish to store them in a
> > database, maybe the application can construct a
suitable table depending
> of
> > the ODF document and translate the content in SQL
script. Maybe the
> > reversed
>
> Well that's going to be a tough thing. Storing
"Structured Documents" in
> a relation database, it's not impossible but it's quite
a great bunch of
> work. That's why people have invented XML-Databases
like
> http://xml.apache.org/
xindice/
>
> Tom
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe odftoolkit.openoffice.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help odftoolkit.openoffice.org
>
>
yeah, I agree that it would be hard
it's just an idea
what about the reversed way - from DB to ODF ?
this should be much easier
thank you
|