> This is a bug in the liblablgl-ocaml-dev debian package, that seem to
> need t be compiled again, Could you report the bug to debian ?
OK, I'll try.
> or I might do it, but I don't have an etch system anymore to test it.
If I experience any problem with this bug report, I'll ask help to you.
> You could recompile it your self in the mean time.
I followed your advice and rebuild the two packages liblablgl-ocaml(-dev)_1.02-2_i386.deb from sources :
all works perfectly now.
Thank you very much for your efficient help !
--------------------------------------------
But I now remember to have met these "inconsistent assumptions" elsewhere :
when I tried to build debo Spaceman Spiff - from planet Zorg indeed - :
http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~rbridson/personal/spiff/
I got this :
ocamlopt -inline 20 -o spiff.opt -I +labltk -I +lablGL unix.cmxa labltk.cmxa lablgl.cmxa togl.cmxa texhelp.o tex.cmx collision.cmx fixedobj.cmx freeobj.cmx badguy.cmx spiff.cmx wall.cmx level.cmx mousehelp.o mouse.cmx game.cmx ui.cmx main.cmx
Files game.cmx and /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.2/lablGL/togl.cmxa
make inconsistent assumptions over implementation Togl
make: *** [spiff.opt] Error 2
Please do you think the problem could solve same way here, rebuilding some Debian package ?
Probably, 'll try.
Fabrice
.