I don't think this is the full truth. From my messing around with
camlp4 3.10 it seems that it expects to match the revised syntax.
On May 21, 2007, at 11:53 AM, dmitry grebeniuk wrote:
> It was really ugly, but now it's resolved. New camlp4
> allows to use original syntax. For example, looking at
> message from caml-list:
> [..skip..]
> ============================================================
>
> It's definitely an original syntax.
--
http://wagerlabs.com/
.