Re: "ocaml_beginners"::[] Pure fun ?

--- In ocaml_beginners%40yahoogroups.com">ocaml_beginnersyahoogroups.com, Martin Jambon
<martin_jambon...> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2007, fabricemarchant wrote:
>
> > Hi !
> >
>; > Noticing lot of OCaml programmers just ditch the object part of the
> > language, we can wonder if some others give up all its imperative
> > features in order to exclusively write functional code.
>
> You will always find fundamentalists, pedants, etc. who are very
proud of
> their ignorance.
>
> > It seems that OCaml has a lot of keywords and characteristics and
> > that we could live with some carefully choosen subparts of the
> > language, keeping however very comfortable.
>
> Yes, you could give up your car, your money, and everything you own,
and
> still be happy. Some people do this.
> Not me

And what about a "Persistent Data Structure Library" like this one :
http://ocaml-reins.sourceforge.net/
?

> > Is it a great pity not to use imperative coding ? Will we really
> > lose a lot of efficiency ?
>
> No, that's an old myth.
Good !

Regards,

Fabrice

Messages in this topic (0) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic

.