Building on rc9 on intel...

Please don't misunderstand what I am saying.
I am not making demands.
I am just trying to understand how to proceed. The real
world situation 
I am in with equipment deliveries means I need to be
building and 
testing as quickly as the openafs community and the
gatekeepers feel 
comfortable releasing code.
I am sorry if I offended any one I didn't mean to.
I do believe that Apple needs to know that OpenAFS is very
important to 
all of us and to give the openafs community the resources
and help they 
need.  The only way I know to help Apple understand this is
to talk 
about my needs openly, file bugs, and contribute what little
resources I 
have in testing.

Thanks for the clarification on the patch I can wait for
next release 
for more testing.

Chaskiel M Grundman wrote:
> 
> 
> --On Thursday, March 09, 2006 14:43:24 -0500 Everette
Allen 
> <Everette_Allenncsu.edu> wrote:
> 
>> Right.  So I had already applied Ed's patch and am
building Universal now
>> as well as it having fixed the lwp issue.  Am I
doing the wrong thing?
> No. I just thought that Ed's patch was overkill for
just fixing the LWP 
> issue, and that if you hadn't gotten it from him yet
(or if you had some 
> problem with it), that you could get by with the
smaller fix I posted.
> 
>> What is the plan for rc10 and beyond?
> Ed's patch appears to have been integrated into CVS,
which presumably 
> means it will be in rc10 unless problems are found.
> 
>> For my part I ...
> I don't speak for the gatekeepers, but making demands
like this is 
> unlikely to get you much sympathy.
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Everette Gray Allen		Systems Programmer II
ITD Computing Services	Macintosh Support Specialist
2620 Hillsborough St, Campus Box 7109
Raleigh, NC 27695-7109  AIM: EveretteAlln
919-515-4558		Everette_Allenncsu.edu
_______________________________________________
port-darwin mailing list
port-darwinopenafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/port-darwin