On Sunday 23 April 2006 17:02, Marc Santhoff wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 23.04.2006, 11:52 -0400 schrieb Hal
Vaughan:
> > On Sunday 23 April 2006 06:34, Bernard Marcelly
wrote:
> > > Bonjour Hal Vaughan
> > >
> > > I have recently filed an issue on this
problem
> > > <http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64345
>
> > >
> > > IMHO it is a defect that it is now impossible
to know the exact
> > > version number, since there are new
functionalities, corrections
> > > of bugs, and new bugs at each minor version.
> > >
> > > Bernard
> >
> > I noticed someone says this is intentional. Are
they of the
> > thought that as long as the version number
specified stays the
> > same, everything is supposed to be compatible?
>
> Has someone had a look at the Windows equivalent of
Unix'
> "~/.sversionrc"?
I hadn't been able to look yet, I've been out all day.
Thanks for the
heads up on it!
> I think it's in the registry or user file space ...
(no installation
> of 2.x on *nix available here, for 1.x it has all
nubers).
>
> Does that have the complete 2.x.x version number?
No, just build numbers. Is there any place where I can get
a list of
the release versions (1.0, 1.1.x, 2.0, 2.0.x...) and the
corresponding
build numbers?
Hal
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe api.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help api.openoffice.org
|