Leonard Mada wrote:
> Armin Le Grand wrote:
>> Christian Lippka wrote:
>>> I'm very in favor of improving our current
selection visualization,
>>> but I would prefer if we find a solution that
does not change the
>>> appearance of the selected shapes...
>> But Christian is right with the point that it makes
no sense to change
>> the visualisation of the object, ...
>> It is better to think of the selection as a kind of
'overlay' as it is
>> with the green handles.
>
> I did much professional graphics processing (especially
with Photoshop).
> All programs (and methods) had their quirks.
>
> Nevertheless, I believe that a distinct border is the
best solution for
> a selection.
>
> REASONS
> - an overlay often obscures the underlying objects too
much
> - color is difficult to judge (and many visual effects
depend on the
> specific colors) -> especially for professional
graphics editing, where
> the end results depends on various visual effects due
to the colours,
> this is an important aspect
>
> I would prefer a *strong border* with a *distinct
color*.
>
> Alternatively, draw a number of arrows from the center
of gravity of the
> selection towards all selected objects. This is
probably more complex,
> but much more suggestive and allows the user to
visualise the borders
> accurately. It is less applicable for small objects.
>
>> With Overlay, we can do something similar. Think
about drawing a
>> selection shape 1/2 transparent with definable
color over the shape to
>> make it somewhat 'ghosted'
>
> As I sad, ghosted selections are more difficult to
visualise. Sometimes
> they are useful, but often I got the impression that
there is a better
> way to do it.
>
So You would be fine with e.g. the following:
- Take the outline of the selected objects
- Take the line width of the object, add a definable size
for selected
(e.g. 2 mm)
- Use a dashed linestyle for it (to have spaces where the
original
shape's linestyle is visible)
- Draw it as selection in a definable color (selection color
of the system)
Optional:
- draw it 50% transparent (evtl. without dashed)
- animate it
Maybe we should take the normal text selection case as a
analogon.
There, the selection is (depending on app) a x-or'ed or with
selection-color painted rectangle. We also have a blinking
cursor.
The analog for a draw application would be a rectangle/XOR
region for
each multi-selected shape.
XOR has it's own problems (gray background), so when using
selection
color, a text selection seems to be 'behind' the text. For
text
selections there is no problem, there are no chars which
completely
cover their selection area. This is different for shapes, so
maybe the
selection area needs to be a bit expanded.
This would allow to also visualize one of the multi-selected
objects as
'active' object (similar to the blinking cursor). This is
required for
being able to change multi-selection using only keyboard
(not possible
ATM, but required for accessibility, see issue #i44042#).
There must be
a possibility to 'travel' one object of the multi-selection.
I made a document with some examples. The selection color is
just for
experimenting, You may change it in the sytles dialog.
Attaching.
I hope for playing around with more ideas here. Be creative!
--
Greetings, Armin Le Grand
Armin.Le.Grand sun.com
> Kind regards,
>
> Leonard Mada
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe graphics.openoffice.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help graphics.openoffice.org
>
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe graphics.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help graphics.openoffice.org |